Originally posted by ZahlanziNo, don't do it man!! 😲
[b]There are many religions that have a certain concept of hell. Which is, eternal suffering. This is opposed to eternal bliss for those that managed to check the necessary boxes on the "go to heaven" form.
Let's talk about it.
2 edits
-Removed-You have made a statement and have been asked to qualify it, You have stated that I frequently ask users to keep on topic, I want to know how frequently for it appears to me that you simply made it up and not only that you believe what you made up making you demonstrably delusional.
You were not asked what other users have noticed you were asked to provide a qualification for a statement you made in numerical terns. Citing what other users think does not answer or even address the question you were asked, so we shall ask you again, 'what percentage of my posts do i ask users to stay on topic so that you can term it 'frequently?', are we talking 20 percent of the time, (one in five posts) or 5 percent of the time (one in twenty posts) or are we more talking more like one in ten thousand and I divesgeester have been caught out again talking absolute drivel and professing belief in nothing but my own propoganda percentage of posts?
You may round the percentage up or down - thanks.
-Removed-Yes you do need to qualify it because you have made a statement that has no basis in reality and demonstrated an empirically established propensity for delusional thinking. I suggest to you that the reason you have now failed to qualify your statement on two occasions is that you cannot because of its delusional nature. You can send any documents to anyone you like given your propensity for drivel I doubt anyone will take them seriously, I certainly dont and I don't know anyone here who does.
You seem to also be harbouring the delusion that by repeating the same drivel again and again it might suddenly become real to someone other than you. I am afraid that's not how reality works for most people, but you need not concern yourself with that, you have your delusional propaganda to prop you up every day.
Are we talking say one in a thousand posts? is that the frequency you are referring to?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat's a good one, makes me laugh. 😏
Yes you do need to qualify it because you have made a statement that has no basis in reality and demonstrated an empirically established propensity for delusional thinking. I suggest to you that the reason you have now failed to qualify your statement on two occasions is that you cannot because of its delusional nature. You can send any documents t ...[text shortened]... day.
Are we talking say one in a thousand posts? is that the frequency you are referring to?
