Hell- this is Buckky

Originally posted by RBHILL
Originally posted by KellyJay
What is evil in your eyes?
People who.....
Kelly


I think it is evil to send people to Hell. That is the most evil concept of them all. Hell is a nasty evil idea that should be dumped into the trash can of wrong concepts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I kn ...[text shortened]... l not God. Satan has blinded people by making them think that God is evil, when he is not evil.

I'm not an atheist. I just claim to know nothing pertaining to what God is or how it works.. The Christian faith that I grew up in has turned me off since I was a child. The Hell idea tells me that it's a primitive religion with primitive ideas about the nature of goodness. Nothing good in my view comes from torture. I can't get behind a God that displays a mean and touchy attitude about us filthy sinners. To want to become a part of a religion there must be something appealing about the doctrine that reals you in. Something that sounds better than good. It sounds perfect in every way. Christianity leaves me cold because of it's concept of an angry God that needed a Blood sacrafice from His Son before mankind could be forgivin for the sins of Adam and Eve. Wacky is an understatement.

Originally posted by vishvahetu
What dont you understand of "thou shalt not kill"

Its in your own teachings.

Defending animal slaughter is nonsense, and any religion that supports it is bogus, and is cheating the people.

When it says thou shall not kill it is talking about humans.

Like in genesis God killed an animal instead of adam and eve for a scarifice for them

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
beef causes cancer as does pork? what about lamb? Jesus ate lamb.

Maybe but I don't like its taste.

Originally posted by vishvahetu
What dont you understand of "thou shalt not kill"

Its in your own teachings.

Defending animal slaughter is nonsense, and any religion that supports it is bogus, and is cheating the people.

Jesus also took it a little ferther by saying if you hate someone you have killed in your heart.

Originally posted by vishvahetu
This is the pathetic level Christians have come, defending animal cruelty.

The Bible is bogus...... and only foolish and insincere persons accept it.

Are you familiar with the section in Genesis talking about Cain and Abel?

Cain was a farmer, while Abel was a shepherd. They were to both give a sacrifice unto the Lord, and naturally, Cain's sacrifice was the bounty of his harvest, vegetables and such, while Abel's sacrifice was the bounty of his flock, an animal (lamb, sheep, goat, I dunno, it's beside the point).

Abel's sacrifice was pleasing to the Lord, while Cain's was not. Cain grew jealous of Abel, and in his rage, slew him. Cain sinned in the eyes of the Lord because he murdered Abel. If what you say is true, and killing an animal is a sin, then both would have sinned equally, but this is obviously not the case.

You call my book bogus and me foolish and insincere, and yet you claim your book is true, even though you also claim that it has been around for hundreds of thousands of years. Right, yeah, clearly, that's logical.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Are you familiar with the section in Genesis talking about Cain and Abel?

Cain was a farmer, while Abel was a shepherd. They were to both give a sacrifice unto the Lord, and naturally, Cain's sacrifice was the bounty of his harvest, vegetables and such, while Abel's sacrifice was the bounty of his flock, an animal (lamb, sheep, goat, I dunno, it's besid has been around for hundreds of thousands of years. Right, yeah, clearly, that's logical.

God didnt like cains because plants aren't really likving things in a biblical sence.

I bet Vishie will not responed.

Originally posted by buckky
I'm not an atheist. I just claim to know nothing pertaining to what God is or how it works.. The Christian faith that I grew up in has turned me off since I was a child. The Hell idea tells me that it's a primitive religion with primitive ideas about the nature of goodness. Nothing good in my view comes from torture. I can't get behind a God that displays a m ...[text shortened]... n before mankind could be forgivin for the sins of Adam and Eve. Wacky is an understatement.

I don't see why you don't find hope in a human Sacrifice of Jesus for us. To me there is more hope in this then trying to work for our own salvation.

Originally posted by RBHILL
I don't see why you don't find hope in a human Sacrifice of Jesus for us. To me there is more hope in this then trying to work for our own salvation.

Why the need for a Blood sacrafice ? Does that not seem somewhat cave man in it's nature? It turns me off. It does not inspire me at all. It seems nuts.

Originally posted by buckky
Why the need for a Blood sacrafice ? Does that not seem somewhat cave man in it's nature? It turns me off. It does not inspire me at all. It seems nuts.

Read "The Gift of the Magi" by O. Henry. It won't take long, it's a short story. You can even find it online.

Redemption through the Cross is a loving gift from God. You're letting the forest blind you to the trees.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Read "The Gift of the Magi" by O. Henry. It won't take long, it's a short story. You can even find it online.

Redemption through the Cross is a loving gift from God. You're letting the forest blind you to the trees.

What is the forest ?

Originally posted by buckky
What is the forest ?

Actually, I think I got the phrase wrong.

It's supposed to be "You can't see the forest for the trees."

Meaning you are focusing on insignificant details. The value of the whole is more important.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Actually, I think I got the phrase wrong.

It's supposed to be "You can't see the forest for the trees."

Meaning you are focusing on insignificant details. The value of the whole is more important.

Those insignificant details sicken me. How can I get past them ? Why don't you become a Hindhu ? I bet there is something about that religion that turns you off ? Something about Christianity turns me off. It's the insignificant details that make or break a religion. Why even have them if they make no difference ? Why even talk of the Blood of Christ ? Why not just jump over the whole story, and just believe in Jesus ? Is that what you are saying ? I thought the main idea was to believe in the Cross as a way to Salvation ? Is the Cross an insignifcant detail ?

Originally posted by buckky
Why the need for a Blood sacrafice ? Does that not seem somewhat cave man in it's nature? It turns me off. It does not inspire me at all. It seems nuts.

To bad if accoring to the Bible there was no cave man.

Originally posted by RBHILL
When it says thou shall not kill it is talking about humans.

Like in genesis God killed an animal instead of adam and eve for a scarifice for them

God didn't kill an animal........its a fabricated story.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Are you familiar with the section in Genesis talking about Cain and Abel?

Cain was a farmer, while Abel was a shepherd. They were to both give a sacrifice unto the Lord, and naturally, Cain's sacrifice was the bounty of his harvest, vegetables and such, while Abel's sacrifice was the bounty of his flock, an animal (lamb, sheep, goat, I dunno, it's besid ...[text shortened]... has been around for hundreds of thousands of years. Right, yeah, clearly, that's logical.

The story is fabricated and not real........so I am not going to comment about it.