Historical facts.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
I'll ask you plainly Kelly. You've said more than once you don't ignore science. - YOU alone made this statement. - I have presented you with an example where you clearly do ignore science. Do you accept that?

Or are you just going to carry on playing dumb?

I keep telling you the answer to the age of the universe is a meaningless variable with respect to how the universe got here, how the universe behaves, and adds nothing to the calculus for life’s origin, or how the information that directs life’s code.

@KellyJay said
I keep telling you the answer to the age of the universe is a meaningless variable with respect to how the universe got here, how the universe behaves, and adds nothing to the calculus for life’s origin, or how the information that directs life’s code.

Irrelevant.

You claim you do not ignore science. Clearly that was a lie.

Edit: And the age of the universe is not a meaningless variable as to how the universe and life got here. That's probably the daftest thing I have ever read in this forum. Your very existence is down to the vast age of the universe. - Yet another example of you ignoring science.

Sorry Kelly, but at this point I am seriously questioning your intelligence.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Irrelevant.

You claim you do not ignore science. Clearly that was a lie.

Edit: And the age of the universe is not a meaningless variable as to how the universe and life got here. That's probably the daftest thing I have ever read in this forum. Your very existence is down to the vast age of the universe. - Yet another example of you ignoring science.

Sorry Kelly, but at this point I am seriously questioning your intelligence.

Who is ignoring science I am telling you that the point you are making doesn’t add to or take away from anything to do with the universe or life. The only one ignoring anything is you as you are demanding I accept something that plays no part in either the universe's origin or life. You may as well be arguing about what your favorite color is when speaking about Ohm’s law.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Irrelevant.

You claim you do not ignore science. Clearly that was a lie.

Edit: And the age of the universe is not a meaningless variable as to how the universe and life got here. That's probably the daftest thing I have ever read in this forum. Your very existence is down to the vast age of the universe. - Yet another example of you ignoring science.

Sorry Kelly, but at this point I am seriously questioning your intelligence.

I have given you my reasoning for rejecting long periods of time as a necessary
variable, it is timing not the length of time when the actual work would be needed
to be done. You can have all the time in an eternal universe if all of the necessary
ingredients required for life are not in the same place at the same time, more
time does not alter the fact nothing could ever move to a life-friendly place
under those conditions.

Long periods would never alter requirements simply by existing, nothing magical
about deep time that would automatically make something possible that is not.
A life-friendly move towards life requires a friendly environment, a lack of
inhibitors, and the proper amounts of ingredients, in the proper forms so they
could connect correctly countless times over and over again keeping all the
necessary right-handed connections and left-handed connections properly
occurring, lots of time do not suspend reality to make it happen as you seem to
think, just because so some unguided process without goals, or a notion of any
kind of target to shoot for could do it.

The details that could move everything towards a life-friendly manner all have to
be true at the same time, in the same place, in the right conditions, at each step
of the whole process before things fall apart and degrade which is the normal
behavior of the universe, you are the one ignoring facts. For some reason,
you think long periods of time must have creative powers that could build very
complex functioning living systems with integrated systems, error, and level
checking just because. That is not something you can show through
experimentation, but on blind faith you accept it.