Originally posted by scottishinnz Well, there is no evidence of god. Based on that lack of evidence, the most parsimonious argument is that god does not exist.
Originally posted by scottishinnz Well, there is no evidence of god. Based on that lack of evidence, the most parsimonious argument is that god does not exist.
Well, there is no evidence of god.
For you to be able to make such an absolute negation you require absolute knowledge.
You make the claim that a being with absolute knowledge does not exist, and in the same breath you claim to be that being with absolute knowledge. That is flawed logic my friend.
Originally posted by dj2becker For you to be able to make such an absolute negation you require absolute knowledge.
Why?
I would argue that I do not require absolute knowledge to make this statement. Did Einstein have absolute knowledge when he proposed relativity? Does it make it untrue if he didn't have complete knowledge?
Originally posted by dj2becker [b]Well, there is no evidence of god.
For you to be able to make such an absolute negation you require absolute knowledge.
You make the claim that a being with absolute knowledge does not exist, and in the same breath you claim to be that being with absolute knowledge. That is flawed logic my friend.[/b]
AMEN! GOD has blissed you dj with a jeenyus brane. Dum peeple liek me are so blissed by you.
Does whut you say meen that Muffy iz reel? Tell me smart won. Iz Muffy reel or no?