10 Mar '05 20:07>
Originally posted by dj2beckerFair enough. So I will assume that you & I both agree if we lived each other's lives, there is a possibility that I would become a Christian and you could have been agnostic, right?
[b]But isn't it possible someone could have had similiar circumstances to you and not have had the same revelation you have had? Some could be worse and some could be better.
What you are saying is true. There are many of my freinds that have grown up with me and have not had exactly the same revelation as me. There are some that are worse off tha ...[text shortened]... exactly the same beliefs. However the chances are very great that you would not be an agnostic. [/b]
So if the above premise is accurate, why is it not possible for the agnostic and the christian to peacefully co-exist without condemnation? The agnostic, at least my personal belief, does not discredit the accuracy of Christianity nor do I accept it. I just believe it is beyond the comprehension of mankind to accurately decipher. I feel the same with all religions.
Christianity, as indicated by some here, is very precise on how things are: If you don't accept Christ, you are going to Hell regardless of whatever life you live. I understand how being a non-Xian would not allow one entry into the Christian Heaven and I accept that. I don't agree with the notion that just because one may believe something different than Christianity that not only are they not allowed into Heaven but they will also spend an eternity in suffering. For me, that's the fundamental flaw of it. Not that not being allowed into Heaven but to be sentenced to Hell for believing in Mohammed or Buddha or Thor, for that matter.