Originally posted by lucifershammer
[b]Yes, they should.
Okay. Why?
However, there are many a slip ... Time flows, the laws change.
You're describing what does happen, not what should happen. What does happen is a matter of empirical fact, of history. What should happen is a matter of moral judgment -- of right and wrong.
Yes, for preservation ...[text shortened]... rence to "non-temporal non-arbitrary(LH: ??) laws that are inflexible" at some level.[/b]
You're like an obnoxious child with all your "why"s. Here's an answer for all of them: Because we are human, we are flawed, and we are more often than not flat out wrong. We are full of ourselves and always think that we have all the answers when we don't. Our knowledge of good and evil, of right and wrong, is an illusion. We are experts at nothing but making mistakes and then denying responsibility for those mistakes. We need to follow what others tell us to do (laws) because otherwise we'll do nothing but make mistakes. However, an open forum and ability for non law makers to effect and change laws is necessary because the law makers themselves are human, and are experts at making mistakes.
This tendency of humans to make mistakes is also one of the reasons people run to religion. Religion will tell you what to do, and it must be the right thing because religion comes from God, not just a bunch of flawed humans who are experts at making mistakes. This is what people crave. Unfortunately for these people religion was created and is run by a bunch of flawed humans who are experts at making mistakes.
I'm not saying that an untimate morality does not exist. I'm not saying that it exists, either. All I'm saying is that you are a human, too, and anything that comes out of your intuition is automatically suspect and must be examined from every angle and every direction. Much of it is quite possibly right. But to be so sure of yourself based on what you feel in your heart is typically human and therefore ultimately untrustworthy.
A moral code in a human mind, therefore, must be exposed to the same sort of system that runs secular laws. Much of it is possibly wrong, and every so often every human encounters situations that expose these problems within the system. When this happens the code must be examined and re-examined, and most likely shifted around and changed. This happens on a fairly regular basis. Are you truly willing to announce to the world that you solved that last problem and have found the ultimate moral code that is true for all? If this is so please share. I'm tired of being wrong same as everyone else.
However, if you are just trying to claim that there exists an ultimate morality (without knowing exactly what it is) just because you strongly feel that there are a few moral issues that seem to be probably true and good for everyone, then you are simply blowing hot air and I suggest that you get in touch with your flawed nature as a human and try to understand that God loves you and accepts you despite you not knowing anything and you making mistake after mistake after mistake.
Edit: fixing an italics runover from the quote.
Edit 2: not fixing a bold runover from the quote. Sheesh. The quote really should be seperate from the new text. Something to bring up in site ideas, I guess.