Originally posted by FreakyKBH
I have several children and they have all made positive decisions regarding salvation. Thanks for reminding me of one more thing for which to be thankful.
However, if one of them were to reject that gift, I would support their judgment.
Now it's my turn. If you had a child and someone killed your child after raping and torturing them, what would you want done to the person who performed the heinous acts?
Obviously, I would feel like bashing the person's skull in.
However, I don't judge that to be the morally right thing to do. Vengence is hardly an infallible source of moral principle.
Similarly, I often feel like eating chocolate; that doesn't mean I think it's always the right thing to do. Emotion and desire can prevent, as much as enable, moral (or, in this analogy, prudential) behavior.
So, what would I want? I would want the perpetrator brought to justice and punished by imprisonment for the finite spell of his life.
I wouldn't want him to go to hell forever. What good would that serve?
To summarize:
I support putting a stranger who tortures and rapes my child in prison for a finite spell.
You support the damnation of your child to an eternity of agony for not accepting Jesus Christ as his Lord and Saviour (i.e., by becoming an atheist).