How To Be Washed in the Blood

Originally posted by @divegeester
For those interested in my perspective on this, here is an article which I don’t fully subscribe to (nor the website which I don’t know) but opens the topic nicely and links the apparent Christian obsession with being drenched in blood, to its pagan roots.

The article also mentions other “churchy” activities such as “pleading the blood”, another non ...[text shortened]... blood sacrifice was “sprinkling”.

Avoid paganistic ritualisms creeping into one’s thinking.

You’re muddying the waters, tiger. I think you’re embarrassed not only by your blunder, but by falsely claiming someone else blundered.

The boomerang you threw at sonship has circled back and bopped you on the noggin.

You claimed “washed in the blood” was Scripturally inaccurate. You were wrong. Case closed.

Originally posted by @romans1009
You’re muddying the waters, tiger. I think you’re embarrassed not only by your blunder, but by falsely claiming someone else blundered.

The boomerang you threw at sonship has circled back and bopped you on the noggin.

You claimed “washed in the blood” was Scripturally inaccurate. You were wrong. Case closed.

What we have here is the scuba kid once again being too vain to admit when he’s wrong, or at least when you or Sonship are correct.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
What we have here is the scuba kid once again being too vain to admit when he’s wrong, or at least when you or Sonship are correct.

LOL

And he’s got too much invested in his faulty position now to ever admit it - he’ll just continue plodding along in a hopeless endgame or leave the table and hope no one notices when he never returns.

It’s interesting how he first claimed “washed in the blood” was Scripturally inaccurate and then, when his blunder was exposed, he modified his position to Scripturally inaccurate according to sonship’s preferred version of the Bible.

He then started trying to muddy the waters by criticizing churches - perhaps in the hope that rajk would show up to spew some hate as a further distraction.

Very devious behavior by snorkel boy.

Originally posted by @romans1009
LOL

And he’s got too much invested in his faulty position now to ever admit it - he’ll just continue plodding along in a hopeless endgame or leave the table and hope no one notices when he never returns.

It’s interesting how he first claimed “washed in the blood” was Scripturally inaccurate and then, when his blunder was exposed, he modified his po ...[text shortened]... uld show up to spew some hate as a further distraction.

Very devious behavior by snorkel boy.

Assuming of course that Rajk is actually a different person.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Assuming of course that Rajk is actually a different person.

The way ToO’s been writing in the third person like Duchess and the way Duchess mysteriously showed up in the SF and the similar writing tells of Duchess and FMF makes me wonder if all the Christ deniers are the same person with 10 different personalities.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Are you going to ignore this question sonship?

Typo:

I meant to write this:

As far as the east is from the [west] so far has He removed our transgressions from us." (Psalm 103:11,12)

Originally posted by @sonship
Typo: I meant to write this:

[b]
As far as the east is from the [west] so far has He removed our transgressions from us." (Psalm 103:11,12)

[/b]

But it wasn’t a “typo”, nor were you meaning to write the text above when you originally replied “yes” (I am going to ignore your question).

You are being dishonest sonship.

Originally posted by @divegeester
But it wasn’t a “typo”, nor were you meaning to write the text above when you originally replied “yes” (I am going to ignore your question).

You are being dishonest sonship.

No, no no, divegeester. These two matters that you raise are not related in my mind at all.

I checked over what I wrote and noticed a TYPO.
Do you mind ??!

The OTHER matter was me honestly answering that, Yes, I WOULD ignore further provocations about the Recovery Version concerning some passage we discussed.

By the way, by mentioning my fondness of the RcV you are giving excuse for me to do some free advertizing of a good version of the Bible - the Recovery Version.

Also, this version is now in Chinese, French, Spanish, (I think German) and going to other languages.

Thanks for an opportunity to encourage some curious ones to check the Recovery Version out, especially the online RcV, and the FREE RcV New Testament people can order.
Thanks.

http://www.recoveryversion.bible/

Free samples given of the NT RcV

http://biblesforamerica.org/

Originally posted by @sonship
No, no no, divegeester. These two matters that you raise are not related in my mind at all.

I checked over what I wrote and noticed a TYPO.
Do you mind ??!

The OTHER matter was me honestly answering that, Yes, I WOULD ignore further provocations about the Recovery Version concerning some passage we discussed.

By the way, by mentioning my fond ...[text shortened]... //www.recoveryversion.bible/

Free samples given of the NT RcV

http://biblesforamerica.org/

Have you heard of the Geneva Bible? If so, what’s your opinion on that? Apparently, it predates the 1611 King James Version.

Originally posted by @sonship
No, no no, divegeester...

Yes, yes, yes sonship!

You did not make a typo, you are lying when you said you did.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Yes, yes, yes sonship!

You did not make a typo, you are lying when you said you did.

I see you’re attacking Christians again, tiger. Do you ever accuse atheists and Christ deniers on here of lying or do you only obsequiously seek their approval by attacking Christians?

Originally posted by @divegeester
Yes, yes, yes sonship!

You did not make a typo, you are lying when you said you did.

Yes, yes, yes, I spoke truthfully.
Here's the original mistake followed by my correction.

Original attempt at quotation:

As far as the east is from the east so far has He removed our transgressions from us." (Psalm 103:11,12)

08 May '18 14:28

Correction of typo - second instance of east should be west

Correction of typographical error a couple of days latter.

As far as the east is from the [west] so far has He removed our transgressions from us." (Psalm 103:11,12)

10 May '18 01:08


You're the one lying.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Yes, yes, yes sonship!

You did not make a typo, you are lying when you said you did.

Time for an apology, tiger.

Remember how we discussed what big boys do when they’re wrong?

Originally posted by @sonship
You're the one lying.

I don’t get this...

4th post down on this page: you made a second reply to my question “are you going to ignore this post sonship?” claiming your first reply on the previous page (where you said “no” ), was a “typo”. It wasn’t a typo.

Perhaps I’m misunderstanding you because you replied twice to same post for some reason?