03 Mar '06 07:26>
Originally posted by PawnCurry"In order to try and answer the original question, we need to define exactly what it is to be "human". One poster stated that as opposed to animals, humans have a "soul", and are therefore capable of abstract reasoning and articulate speech."
In order to try and answer the original question, we need to define exactly what it is to be "human". One poster stated that as opposed to animals, humans have a "soul", and are therefore capable of abstract reasoning and articulate speech.
I find this definition to be unsatisfactory. Firstly, there are many humans who are incapable of abstract reasonin ...[text shortened]... ed in with the spirit of the original post, but looking at it from a different angle.
Actually, no (although I am agreeing!). I think we have to define what it is to be an animal. If humans fit that definition then humans are animals. If either speach (communication) or abstract reasoning are used to try and separate humans out, they fail. The only possible way to define humans as any more than animals is based upon this thing called a "soul". Of course, we can't even define what that is, it's unmeasureable and there is no way to directly detect it. We can't even definitively say that animals other than humans DON'T have one.