Hyphenated Christians

Originally posted by stellspalfie
you dont need to give him permission. once its in his inbox its his to do as he chooses.

no its not, its a private message, intended for no one but him, he cannot publish it in
the forum.

Originally posted by galveston75
And how is that exactly?

You sent a threatening, abusive, PM Galveston.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
LOL, i actually thought the text was hilarious. Its not blowing up at all dear Gman, you
have done nothing wrong, you repeatedly asked that a user refrain from harassing you
in the forums, you felt the need to contact the moderators and issue a private
message, relax, let them make of it what they will, its nada!

I know and agree. I guess the writing was on the wall on how he would blow this up and then do what is unethical with a PM.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes it contains no sexual content

Why is galveston75 now concerned enough, about me making the content of his abusive PM know to others, to be contacting the moderators?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
LOL, i actually thought the text was hilarious. Its not blowing up at all dear Gman, you
have done nothing wrong, you repeatedly asked that a user refrain from harassing you
in the forums, you felt the need to contact the moderators and issue a private
message, relax, let them make of it what they will, its nada!

So did Galveston send you this PM by text message? Is that what you're claiming.

Originally posted by galveston75
I guess the writing was on the wall on how he would blow this up and then do what is unethical with a PM.

If a member of your congregation is the victim of abusive behaviour in private, would it be "unethical" for the victim to tell others about that abusive behaviour?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
You sent a threatening, abusive, PM Galveston.

Hummmm? Yes I said I would report him to the moderator to look into this because of my concerns. Do I or anyone else here not have that right if one feels uncomfortable with another person here at RHP?
If anyone here has been abused it surely hasn't been FMF by any means.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no its not, its a private message, intended for no one but him, he cannot publish it in
the forum.

galveston75 has now claimed that it was "unethical" for me to have shown it to anyone. Do you agree?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
You sent a threatening, abusive, PM Galveston.

objection, the text was in protest at the continual harassment of the originator despite
repeated public requests for him to refrain from doing so, it was in response to
perceived bullying and the Gman had every right to ask that he refrain from
discontinuing the harassment, the fact that the text had to be strongly worded is a
testimony to its recipients failure to acquiesce to the request. Internet bullying is a
serious issue and harassment a violation of the terms of service.

Originally posted by galveston75
If anyone here has been abused it surely hasn't been FMF by any means.

Your PM to me was abusive.

Can you quote any post written by me ever, addressed to you, that was even as remotely abusive as your PM to me?

Originally posted by FMF
If a member of your congregation is the victim of abusive behaviour in private, would it be "unethical" for the victim to tell others about that abusive behaviour?

You go to the moderator as anyone here knows. You never cross that line and go public with anyones PM, ever. I would never do that to you or anyone here, ever.
I suggest you do that now and stop digging yourself into a hole as I've just written them about this.

Originally posted by galveston75
Hummmm? Yes I said I would report him to the moderator to look into this because of my concerns. Do I or anyone else here not have that right if one feels uncomfortable with another person here at RHP?
If anyone here has been abused it surely hasn't been FMF by any means.

Galveston you sent an abusive, threatening PM to FMF. That action violates the ToS. FMF on the other hand asked you questions in a public forum, that action doesn't break the ToS. That's what the forums are for after all.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Internet bullying is a serious issue.

Was galveston75's PM an example of "internet bullying"?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Galveston you sent an abusive, threatening PM to FMF. That action violates the ToS. FMF on the other hand asked you questions in a public forum, that action doesn't break the ToS. That's what the forums are for after all.

he was harassing and stalking him after repeated request to refrain from doing so also against the terms of service.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes it contains no sexual content, ill advised? please look up the definition of ill advised,
it does not necessitate a third party.

my apologies, i stand corrected. i assumed he was getting some dodgy 'new learnings' from above.