Hyphenated Christians

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Are you being economical with the truth here Rob?

its simply my perception of the event.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Robbie is claiming it was you who was getting 'amorous' with your line of questioning, hence the need for Galvetons bizarre sexual PM.

Which of course is all bollocks.

Well there was absolutely nothing "amorous" about the line of questioning, as anyone who follows stuff here knows, so robbie is presumably alluding to PMs that galveston75 and/or robbie are presumably being being 'economical with the truth' about.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
its simply my perception of the event.

You didn't think galveston75's PM was abusive?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Robbie is claiming it was you who was getting 'amorous' with your line of questioning, hence the need for Galvetons bizarre sexual PM.

Which of course is all bollocks.

sexual Pm's? wow, if the News of the World was still in operation an editors post awaits
you. What he stated was , I am not gay please stop following me, it contained no
sexual content whatsoever.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sexual Pm's? wow, if the News of the World was still in operation an editors post awaits
you. What he stated was , I am not gay please stop following me, it contained no
sexual content whatsoever.

"No sexual content whatsoever"? It was about sex and little else, robbie. Has he not shown it to you? Are you just going on what he has claimed was in the PM? A whole bunch of people have read it and will be baffled by what you are claiming about its content.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sexual Pm's? wow, if the News of the World was still in operation an editors post awaits
you. What he stated was , I am not gay please stop following me, it contained no
sexual content whatsoever.

Raising the issue of someones sexuality is not sexual? 😕

Have you read the PM? Honest answer now please.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sexual Pm's? wow, if the News of the World was still in operation an editors post awaits
you. What he stated was , I am not gay please stop following me, it contained no
sexual content whatsoever.

why did he bring up peoples sexuality? didnt it strike you as bizarre? can you imagine if people started accusing jeramy paxman or michael parkinson of being gay because they asked a lot of questions.

you accused me of asking too many questions a couple of days ago, did you start to think im gay?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Raising the issue of someones sexuality is not sexual? 😕

hinting that someone might be heterosexual is sexual? wow!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Raising the issue of someones sexuality is not sexual?

"Raising the issue of someones sexuality" in an abusive, aggressive, threatening way.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
hinting that someone might be heterosexual is sexual? wow!

Have you read the PM, robbie? Truthful answer this time, please.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
hinting that someone might be heterosexual is sexual? wow!

Have you read the PM? Honest answer please.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
hinting that someone might be heterosexual is sexual? wow!

I'm still trying to go to bed but this is too good to ignor. I wonder why if it'ssooooo bad FMF has not posted it for all to see yet?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
why did he bring up peoples sexuality? didnt it strike you as bizarre? can you imagine if people started accusing jeramy paxman or michael parkinson of being gay because they asked a lot of questions.

you accused me of asking too many questions a couple of days ago, did you start to think im gay?

Its hard to say, perhaps it was a stab at humour, yes i think you are gay and simply
use Mrs Palfie as a front for your deviant activities. I am sure i saw you painted gold in
a leotard riding a float in a gay parade once.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Have you read the PM? Honest answer please.

Previous page he said "disgusting PM, i don't think so, i read it" but now it's clear he hasn't. Or he's lying about its content. Either way robbie's backed himself into a corner of his own making.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its hard to say, perhaps it was a stab at humour...

You read galveston75's PM and you believe "it was a stab at humour"?