Originally posted by FMFYep, still don't understand the point here do you?
galveston75: [b]"How I contact anyone about anything is no ones concern but mine, right?" << This is OK as far as galveston75 is concerned?
FMF: "How I contact anyone about anything is no ones concern but mine, right?" << This is not OK as far as galveston75 is concerned, is that it?[/b]
Well I have to get up in 3 hours for work and haven't slept yet. C you later and hope you can work this out.
Maybe take a poll on "Is it ok to send anyone here at RHP anothers PM that was sent in private, hense the "PM" idea?
1 edit
Originally posted by stellspalfieno, it went beyond that, it was harassment plain and simple, the Gman specifically
theres nothing to get. he didnt stalk you, he pressed you for answers in a debate. you sent him an abusive message. you made the wrong call, you should be man enough to apologize. if im wrong about robbie and disabled people the first thing i would do is say sorry.
requested that he refrain from having any correspondence, he continued the
harassment despite repeated and civil requests to refrain. If you are walking in a public
place, minding your own business and someone comes along and repeatedly asks you
questions after you request them not to, are you not harassing them, are you not
making yourself a nuisance and a pestilent fellow? clearly FMF was inspired by a desire
to spoil this users enjoyment of the site under the guise of asking questions, its what
trolls do, the error is his own for failing to acquiesce to the Gmans petitions that he
simply leave him alone, but he's a bully and could not do so., FMF is the villain in all of
this.
Originally posted by galveston75We're trying to figure out why robbie has been lying, either about reading the PM [if he didn't] or about the nature of its content [if he did] , and robbie is squirming and wriggling. His latest gambit is the fact he used the word "amorous".
Never said that.....
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHave the moderators upheld the accusation of "harassment"?
no, it went beyond that, it was harassment plain and simple, the Gman specifically
requested that he refrain from having any correspondence, he continued the
harassment despite repeated and civil requests to refrain.
If they have, they haven't contacted me.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiegalveston75 could have just ignored the questions. My posts are for all forum members to read. My motivation was to address claims that had been made and also to not acquiesce to being silenced by people making accusations such as the ones you and galveston75 have been making. This is a public forum, robbie.
clearly FMF was inspired by a desire to spoil this users enjoyment of the site under the guise of asking questions, its what trolls do, the error is his own for failing to acquiesce to the Gmans petitions that he
simply leave him alone, but he's a bully and could not do so., FMF is the villain in all of
this.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobieyour analogy sucks. this is a forum for debate, glav was not a passer by strolling along minding his own business. he was actively involved in a debate with fmf and other users.
no, it went beyond that, it was harassment plain and simple, the Gman specifically
requested that he refrain from having any correspondence, he continued the
harassment despite repeated and civil requests to refrain. If you are walking in a public
place, minding your own business and someone comes along and repeatedly asks you
questions afte ...[text shortened]... ly leave him alone, but he's a bully and could not do so., FMF is the villain in all of
this.
you say harassment? but if you go back and read the exchange it takes less than 5 minutes. how can a 5 minute exchange by harassment.
if we all could just say 'stop asking me' every time we got asked a tricky question on a debates forum, there wouldnt be too much debate. we could all make outlandish claims and not have to back them up. it would end up with 20 rj hinds or dasa's.
if fmf had sent glav lots and lots of p.m's then you would have an argument. but he didnt, he just pushed to get answers to one point.
you would have a genuine case if you wanted to complain about me, i swore and was abusive that would be fair enough, i would deserve it for breaching the t.o.s. but galvs behavior from his initial refusing to debate when things got tricky for him to sending stupid, childish p.m's. he's been in the wrong from start to finish.
Originally posted by stellspalfieI see, another graduate of the FMF school for scoundrels, interesting 😵
your analogy sucks. this is a forum for debate, glav was not a passer by strolling along minding his own business. he was actively involved in a debate with fmf and other users.
you say harassment? but if you go back and read the exchange it takes less than 5 minutes. how can a 5 minute exchange by harassment.
if we all could just say 'stop asking ...[text shortened]... ky for him to sending stupid, childish p.m's. he's been in the wrong from start to finish.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRobbie you do realise that everyone in this thread who is not a JW has disagreed with
and another FMF flunkie, googleflunkie, how cozy!
everything you have said.
I mean there is not one single post supporting you or G75 not written by you or G75.
If there is anyone here that supports you two they don't feel strongly enough about it
to bother defending you.
That says something about you...
Can you work out what that is?
Originally posted by googlefudgegalveston75 has claimed that he has received many messages from other posters on this forum that they have told him that they agree with him about me having been "stalking" him etc.. I don't know whether these posters agreed with all the sexual stuff that was in that PM; I don't know if they also tried to get me banned; indeed I don't know whether galveston75 has passed the PM on to any of these many supporters. You say there has not been one single post supporting galveston75 but according to him he has received many PMs from posters expressing their support.
I mean there is not one single post supporting you or G75 not written by you or G75.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieTaking part in a debate in a public forum is not minding your own business
If you are walking in a public
place, minding your own business and someone comes along and repeatedly asks you
questions after you request them not to, are you not harassing them, are you not
making yourself a nuisance and a pestilent fellow? clearly FMF was inspired by a desire
to spoil this users enjoyment of the site under the guise of ...[text shortened]... ly leave him alone, but he's a bully and could not do so., FMF is the villain in all of
this.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by FMFG75 has also lied consistently throughout this debate and more generally on the forum.
galveston75 has claimed that he has received many messages from other posters on this forum that they have told him that they agree with him about me having been "stalking" him etc.. I don't know whether these posters agreed with all the sexual stuff that was in that PM; I don't know if they also tried to get me banned; indeed I don't know whether galveston75 ha ...[text shortened]... ston75 but according to him he has received many PMs from posters expressing their support.
So the fact he claims to have had support in private may or may not be true.
What is true is that as yet I have seen precisely zero (apart from RC) support in public.