Go back
Hyphenated Christians

Hyphenated Christians

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
Sometimes he shows his true colors and it aint pretty.
what are my true colors?

2 edits

Originally posted by stellspalfie
i would suggest you stop taking pleasure in the 'good' things you have received from god when he is also, for no logical reason, cursing other people.

as the majority of physical and mental disabilities are genetic and passed down through generations of families. it would seem you think some how they deserve it?

i suppose you think disease and vi ...[text shortened]... ur delicate glaswegian ears. but your opinions are pretty damn stupid and offensive sometimes.
Deserve it???? where have I stated that people deserve disabilities, please produce
the reference, if you cannot you will retract the statement and issue a full public
apology for this defamatory assertion and refrain from making such assertions in
the future. I have stated that sin (inherited from Adam) is responsible because sin
means just that, aberration, physical and spiritual. Thus we are genetically
predisposed to suffering its effects, ageing, disabilities, disease an eventually death
having inherited it from Adam, our forefather. This is basic Christian theology.
Perhaps if you understood this it might save you from ranting and exhibiting a
wholly unwarranted and somewhat unbalanced perspective, as for us Glaswegians,
we have a certain egalitarian sensibility which makes us convivial, we don't making
fun or being made fun of, but when it gets personal, then you have crossed that fine
line. Its perhaps this subtle difference which evades you at present.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Deserve it???? where have I stated that people deserve disabilities, please produce the
reference, if you cannot you will retract the statement and issue a full public apology
for this defamatory assertion and refrain from making such assertions in the future.
You said "the fact that [people with extreme physical disabilities] have severe disabilities is a testimony to the detrimental effects of sin". So your God figure is either being just or unjust about the consequences of "sin".

1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Deserve it???? where have I stated that people deserve disabilities, please produce
the reference, if you cannot you will retract the statement and issue a full public
apology for this defamatory assertion and refrain from making such assertions in
the future. I have stated that sin (inherited from Adam) is responsible because sin
means just have crossed that fine
line. Its perhaps this subtle difference which evades you at present.
was god correct to punish adam and eve? do you agree with god the humanity should be punished for their mistakes? do you think god has set up a fair system of punishment for mankind?


why would god make some families trees more prone to disabilities than others? shouldnt it be random?

1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Deserve it???? where have I stated that people deserve disabilities, please produce
the reference, if you cannot you will retract the statement and issue a full public
apology for this defamatory assertion and refrain from making such assertions in
the future. I have stated that sin (inherited from Adam) is responsible because sin
means just have crossed that fine
line. Its perhaps this subtle difference which evades you at present.
i didnt see you criticize glaveston for getting personal and crossing the line with his rather disgusting p.m. or criticize your own often personal attacks on fmf? do i smell a hint of hypocrisy?

2 edits

Originally posted by stellspalfie
was god correct to punish adam and eve? do you agree with god the humanity should be punished for their mistakes? do you think god has set up a fair system of punishment for mankind?


why would god make some families trees more prone to disabilities than others? shouldnt it be random?
where have I stated that they deserve it? You cannot produce it, sigh, more tabloid
journalism, oh well!

The creation was subject to futility, not by Gods will, but by mans will, and yes Adam
and Eve deserved it, it was an act of justice. It was also an act of pure love, beyond
human comprehension for God to send the Christ who made a propitiatory sacrifice
which covered or atoned for that original sin and made it possible for all who want it, to
make reparation with God. Yes it perfectly fair and just.

1 edit

Originally posted by stellspalfie
i didnt see you criticize glaveston for getting personal and crossing the line with his rather disgusting p.m. or criticize your own often personal attacks on fmf? do i smell a hint of hypocrisy?
disgusting PM, i don't think so, i read it, the dudes not gay, FMF was being a little too
amorous with his attentions and the Gman told him where to get off and rightly so! So
we sometimes get caught up in the melee, just be careful that's all I am saying.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
where have I stated that they deserve it? You cannot produce it, sigh, more tabloid
journalism, oh well!
I have pointed it out to you, robbie [and everyone knows you're only pretending not to read my posts]. You said "the fact that [people with extreme physical disabilities] have severe disabilities is a testimony to the detrimental effects of sin". So your God figure is either being just or unjust about the consequences of "sin".

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
disgusting PM, i don't think so, i read it, the dudes not gay, FMF was being a little to
amorous with his attentions and the Gman told him where to get off and rightly so!
But I did not send galveston75 any "amorous" PMs. Did he tell you I did?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
disgusting PM, i don't think so, i read it, the dudes not gay, FMF was being a little too
amorous with his attentions and the Gman told him where to get off and rightly so! So
we sometimes get caught up in the melee, just be careful that's all I am saying.
Amorous!? LOL!!!!!

Talk about tabloid sensationalism.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Amorous!? LOL!!!!!

Talk about tabloid sensationalism.
You've seen the PM. In fact quite a lot of regular posters have.


Originally posted by Proper Knob
Amorous!? LOL!!!!!

Talk about tabloid sensationalism.
tee hee 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
tee hee 😀
If galveston75 told you I sent him "amorous" PMs then he's lying to you, robbie.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
tee hee 😀
Are you being economical with the truth here Rob?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
But I did not send galveston75 any "amorous" PMs. Did he tell you I did?
Robbie is claiming it was you who was getting 'amorous' with your line of questioning, hence the need for Galvetons bizarre sexual PM.

Which of course is all bollocks.