OK! You know what a boeing 747 looks like right? You know what a wwii plane looks like right? Well could a wwii plane evolve into a boeing 747 NO! Of course not! See they both have the same blue print but the wwii plane did not evolve into a boeing 747! See us humans have the same blueprint as monkeys but we did not evolve from them! Like a cat can't evolve into a frog or a dog or even a hog! So see I disproved evolution!
28 Apr 07
Originally posted by Jonathan1All you have proven is that you're a fool.
OK! You know what a boeing 747 looks like right? You know what a wwii plane looks like right? Well could a wwii plane evolve into a boeing 747 NO! Of course not! See they both have the same blue print but the wwii plane did not evolve into a boeing 747! See us humans have the same blueprint as monkeys but we did not evolve from them! Like a cat can't evolve into a frog or a dog or even a hog! So see I disproved evolution!
Originally posted by Jonathan1Except all you disproved is saltation, not evolution. Of course, the most famous example of saltation is biblical creationism. So, you just disproved the bible - well done.
OK! You know what a boeing 747 looks like right? You know what a wwii plane looks like right? Well could a wwii plane evolve into a boeing 747 NO! Of course not! See they both have the same blue print but the wwii plane did not evolve into a boeing 747! See us humans have the same blueprint as monkeys but we did not evolve from them! Like a cat can't evolve into a frog or a dog or even a hog! So see I disproved evolution!
Originally posted by scottishinnzsal·ta·tion–noun
Except all you disproved is saltation, not evolution. Of course, the most famous example of saltation is biblical creationism. So, you just disproved the bible - well done.
1. a dancing, hopping, or leaping movement.
2. an abrupt movement or transition.
3. Geology. intermittent, leaping movement of particles of sand or gravel, as from the force of wind or running water.
4. Biology.
...a. a sudden discontinuity in a line of descent.
...b. a mutation.
He did? I think rwingett was right, but maybe you could explain.
Nemesio
Originally posted by Jonathan1Then why do you look like a chimp? 😕
OK! You know what a boeing 747 looks like right? You know what a wwii plane looks like right? Well could a wwii plane evolve into a boeing 747 NO! Of course not! See they both have the same blue print but the wwii plane did not evolve into a boeing 747! See us humans have the same blueprint as monkeys but we did not evolve from them! Like a cat can't evolve into a frog or a dog or even a hog! So see I disproved evolution!
Originally posted by Jonathan1I found a counterexample that's about as logical.
OK! You know what a boeing 747 looks like right? You know what a wwii plane looks like right? Well could a wwii plane evolve into a boeing 747 NO! Of course not! See they both have the same blue print but the wwii plane did not evolve into a boeing 747! See us humans have the same blueprint as monkeys but we did not evolve from them! Like a cat can't evolve into a frog or a dog or even a hog! So see I disproved evolution!
You ever noticed how people who believe in Creationism look really un-evolved? Eyes close together, eyebrow ridges, big furry hands and feet. "I believe God created me in one day." Yeah, looks liked He rushed it. - Bill Hicks
Originally posted by Jonathan1Wow...this is really sad...I hope you are joking 😕
OK! You know what a boeing 747 looks like right? You know what a wwii plane looks like right? Well could a wwii plane evolve into a boeing 747 NO! Of course not! See they both have the same blue print but the wwii plane did not evolve into a boeing 747! See us humans have the same blueprint as monkeys but we did not evolve from them! Like a cat can't evolve into a frog or a dog or even a hog! So see I disproved evolution!
Originally posted by Jonathan1Inaniminate objects do not evolve. The engineering behind them does because that is knowledge passed on by living creatures. Living creatures do evolve over time. They have to since the ecosystem they live in changes with time. If the creatures did not change they would perish.
OK! You know what a boeing 747 looks like right? You know what a wwii plane looks like right? Well could a wwii plane evolve into a boeing 747 NO! Of course not! See they both have the same blue print but the wwii plane did not evolve into a boeing 747! See us humans have the same blueprint as monkeys but we did not evolve from them! Like a cat can't evolve into a frog or a dog or even a hog! So see I disproved evolution!
Originally posted by Jonathan1You sure did. Write up your findings as a full paper and submit it to Nature. After some minor spelling corrections, you could probably just go ahead and use your post for the abstract.
So see I disproved evolution!
http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/submissions/index.html
If I may make a suggestion for the title: "Who Needs Genesis? A Non-Biblical Disproof of Evolution."
Originally posted by Ruppster1This is also the problem with all so-called “watchmaker” arguments for God—of design (pun intended) they presume an artificer by basing the argument on an artifact. They beg the question.
Inaniminate objects do not evolve. The engineering behind them does because that is knowledge passed on by living creatures. Living creatures do evolve over time. They have to since the ecosystem they live in changes with time. If the creatures did not change they would perish.
Originally posted by Jonathan1Yes... however...
OK! You know what a boeing 747 looks like right? You know what a wwii plane looks like right? Well could a wwii plane evolve into a boeing 747 NO! Of course not! See they both have the same blue print but the wwii plane did not evolve into a boeing 747! See us humans have the same blueprint as monkeys but we did not evolve from them! Like a cat can't evolve into a frog or a dog or even a hog! So see I disproved evolution!
There is one small hitch to your theory.
WWII PLANES DON'T BLOODY FORNICATE! DO THEY?
DO THEY?
NO. THEY DON'T!