Originally posted by JS357
I think that the word "god" like all words can be defined descriptively (how people use it) or prescriptively (how people should use it). So can the word "God" which you also use in the this post. It sounds like you are proposing a prescriptive definition of god and God, to include any entity that can do one thing, that thing being "the absolute minimum to cre creates the universe and then departs the scene. To me it might as well be "BB."
One of the problems many of us have with the word "God" is that we don't know precisely what is meant from theist to the next. Though such things are usually invoked to account for the existence of our universe. It is for that reason I argue that for an entity to qualify for being a "god" it must be capable of creating at least our universe (somehow). Whatever else is not strictly necessary. Similarly (and shamelessy copy/pasting of wikipedia for the definition) a bicycle needs to be a human-powered, pedal-driven, single-track vehicle, having two wheels attached to a frame, one behind the other. What colour it is, how big it is, whether it has a "go faster" drinks can wedged between the back wheel and frame is irrelevant,
One of the problems I personally have with the word "God" or "god" is that for any attribute a theist pins upon it, this attribute must be maximal.
I agree that the least capable creator of some universe could be referred to as the big bang, but the point I'm trying to make is that there is a wide gulf between a god that is omni awesome, and a god that is omni-insipid. For example
- A god that is very powerful but can't do everything, and knows very little.
- A god like the one above that likes every creature (not necessary to the same extent)
except those animals which have stripey coats (like tigers and bees), and that they are adorned with these stripes precisely because of it's hatred towards them.
- A cluster god which in ensemble can do absolutely anything but individually they cannot, and in ensemble knows nothing but individually know everything
- A god that can make no more than 2 universes
- A god that knows everything but can do nothing other than create universes
- A god that knows more than humans can possibly know (but not everything), is as potent as it is knowledgeable, and hates everything
.
.
.
and so on...
Essentially we cannot know anything about such an entity whether it existed or not yet the majority insist it MUST be maximally great at whatever it does; I see no basis for such a position.