Originally posted by yousers
I am NOT saying that science is a bad thing. I am all for science. I am simply against the claim that scientific law, as it stands now, is God's law. I believe you hit the nail on the head when you said this:
"The natural, physical laws of the universe are God’s laws. People try to understand them through science."
Now THAT I agree with 100%.
Well the law of gravity is a pretty well constructed law, you drop a
a ton of iron 6 feet and it lands on your foot, you can count on
getting a foot replacement pretty much every time.
That is as close to an absolute law as I can imagine and for anyone
to say thats mans law is begging the question. If God invented the
whole universe for some arcane set of reasons then he/she/it
certainly understood the laws of its creation, including the law of
gravity, which would be high on the list of absolutely necessary
laws, without which you don't get a universe in the first place.
So mankind goes through its cultural advancement to the time
when Newton figured out the rules of gravity and Einstein refined those
same rules delving into the idea of how malleable space and time is,
those laws would have by definition been known by the proported
god who begat our universe. Creationists and a lot of other kinds
of fundamentalists outside of christianity don't like the idea of
mankind developing ANYTHING on its own but anything discovered is
only by the grace of some god. Creationists would deny the very
creativity that is one of definitions of human, instead only
theorizing any such delving into the true laws of what makes the
universe run, these manmade theories, if true, therefore, would only
be allowed to be seen by men by the grace of this god dribbling
understanding to us bit by bit rather than just admitting humans,
well, some humans, have near godlike creativity themselves.
That creationists will never accept.