@pb1022 saidAn "afterlife" is a supernatural phenomenon, is it not? An "afterlife" granted to one and no "afterlife" granted to the other, regardless of lifespan, is a form of supernatural punishment, right?
Did you catch what I wrote about life spans?
Assuming no afterlife, the serial killer enjoyed a long and pleasant life despite being a bad person.
The 6-year-old, despite being a good person, had a very short life.
The injustice is in the life spans not in the lack of supernatural punishment.
@fmf saidIt seems odd, but yeah, there’s nothing wrong with it. I mean everybody gets one bite at the apple. I suppose I’d see something wrong if a “creator entity” decided only humans with brown hair would have finite lives but the rest would get an afterlife, but under your thought experiment, that’s not the case.
So, your personal religious affiliation aside, you agree that there is nothing wrong with the idea of a creator entity creating beings with a finite opportunity to experience life?
@fmf saidNo, in your thought experiment, as I understood it, no one gets an afterlife - not the serial killer and not the 6-year-old.
An "afterlife" is a supernatural phenomenon, is it not? An "afterlife" granted to one and no "afterlife" granted to the other, regardless of lifespan, is a form of supernatural punishment, right?
Therefore the injustice is in the life spans.
@pb1022 saidWhat does the notion of a creator entity deciding that only humans with brown hair would have finite lives have to do with my thought experiment?
I suppose I’d see something wrong if a “creator entity” decided only humans with brown hair would have finite lives but the rest would get an afterlife, but under your thought experiment, that’s not the case.
@pb1022 saidBut an "afterlife" is a supernatural state and you seem to have been saying that, for there to be justice, to your way of thinking, one should get it and the other should not.
No, in your thought experiment, as I understood it, no one gets an afterlife - not the serial killer and not the 6-year-old.Therefore the injustice is in the life spans.
@fmf saidNo, I’m not saying that at all. I’m simply pointing out the injustice in your OP of an afterlife not existing for anyone. If that doesn’t bother you, that’s fine. I think it’s bothersome.
But an "afterlife" is a supernatural state and you seem to have been saying that, for there to be justice, to your way of thinking, one should get it and the other should not.
@pb1022 saidI don't think you have made a case. I don't think imagining or hoping that there is a supernatural phenomenon like an afterlife is any kind of remedy to injustices that people experience in their lifetimes.
I’m simply pointing out the injustice in your OP of an afterlife not existing for anyone.
@fmf saidI think your statement is absurd.
I don't think you have made a case. I don't think imagining or hoping that there is a supernatural phenomenon like an afterlife is any kind of remedy to injustices that people experience in their lifetimes.
Are you telling me a 6-year-old who dies of cancer, who is essentially cheated out of his entire life on earth, does not receive compensation by experiencing a far better and eternal afterlife in Heaven, where all the problems of this world do not exist?
@pb1022 saidI don't see how belief in there being supernatural compensation of some kind alters the here-on-Earth tragedy of a child dying of cancer.
Are you telling me a 6-year-old who dies of cancer, who is essentially cheated out of his entire life on earth, does not receive compensation by experiencing a far better and eternal afterlife in Heaven, where all the problems of this world do not exist?
@fmf saidSo an eternal life in Heaven, free from the heartache and troubles and violence of this world, is no compensation for a 6-year-old who lost his life to cancer.
I don't see how belief in there being supernatural compensation of some kind alters the here-on-Earth tragedy of a child dying of cancer.
Why do you stubbornly cling to arguments and positions that have been blown out of the water?