1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderHmm. Well, I guess I just don't understand that variant of Christianity, and there would be a lot of questions I'd have to ask in order to understand it. Is there a Hell? Does one suffer if one is there? Do you need Jesus to not go there? What is 'sin'? Is sin evil? Why does it mean to be 'saved' from sin if being 'saved' does not mean we will never sin again? Why did Jesus die, anyway? What would it be like if he hadn't died for our sins? Etc.
You are changing your argument. In your first post, you asserted that Christians MUST believe that "everyone else who has ever existed; is a vile, evil person who really, really deserves horrific, eternal torture". This is s ...[text shortened]... d point you in the direction of such statements better than I can.
You don't need to answer these questions, but I don't understand the basic position of Christians if RBHill, dj2becker, etc don't represent Christianity as a whole.
1 edit
Originally posted by AThousandYounghttp://www.ignatius.com/ViewProduct.aspx?SID=1&Product_ID=2384&AFID=12&
Hmm. Well, I guess I just don't understand that variant of Christianity, and there would be a lot of questions I'd have to ask in order to understand it. Is there a Hell? Does one suffer if one is there? Do you need Jesus to not ...[text shortened]... f RBHill, dj2becker, etc don't represent Christianity as a whole.
If you are looking for an introduction to Christianity and a book that is genuine and written without any fame seeking or money seeking mentality on the author's part I can advise you:
Introduction to Christianity.
ISBN: 1586170295
Author: Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger
Length: 300 pages
One of Cardinal Ratzinger's most important and widely read books.
....... Thus, this remarkable elucidation of the Apostle's Creed gives an excellent, modern interpretation of the foundations of Christianity. Ratzinger's profound treatment of Christianity's basic truths combines a spiritual outlook with a deep knowledge of Scripture and the history of theology.
Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, was for over two decades The Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under Pope John Paul II. He is the author of Spirit of the Liturgy, Salt of the Earth, Introduction to Christianity, God and the World, Milestones, Called to Communion, God Is Near Us, and many other works published by Ignatius Press.
http://www.ignatius.com/ViewProduct.aspx?SID=1&Product_ID=2384&AFID=12&
Originally posted by ivanhoeSomebody's gotta do it since you members of the mainstream Christian faiths never bother to point out the grave doctrinal errors the fundies like BF, RBHILL, Darfius, etc. spew forth everyday in this forum. Why is that, Ivanhoe? Where are you and lucifershammer when there's such work to be done; you two certainly aren't shy when it comes to spouting about personal freedom issues but when it comes to meeting the heretics head on, you're nowhere to be found. As ATY's first post points out, they're giving a false and unfavorable impression of Christianity (Coletti the Calvinist as well); shouldn't you be defending the faith from such errors and blasphemies?
Frogstomp and No1 as Christian preachers and defenders of the Christian faith at RHP ?
What in the world is happening ? Is Judgement Day approaching ?
Originally posted by no1marauderThese are very good points that I have been waiting a very long time to see addressed.
Somebody's gotta do it since you members of the mainstream Christian faiths never bother to point out the grave doctrinal errors the fundies like BF, RBHILL, Darfius, etc. spew forth everyday in this forum. Why is that, Ivanhoe? Where are you and lucifershammer when there's such work to be done; you two certainly aren't shy when it comes to ...[text shortened]... the Calvinist as well); shouldn't you be defending the faith from such errors and blasphemies?
1 edit
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesThat's a tough one.
Let's analyze it from the point of view of the Office of the Inquisition.
Who should the Catholic Church fear more, and why: RBHILL or Galileo?
Galileo spoke scientific truth, and that is a big no no.
Arby Hillon the other hand still possesses the power to reproduce.
I think you gotta go after Roast Beef sandwich.
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesRBHill of course. He represents an anti-Catholic form of Christianity. I think. Or is it only Darfius that thinks the Catholics are the new Evil Empire?
Let's analyze it from the point of view of the Office of the Inquisition.
Who should the Catholic Church fear more, and why: RBHILL or Galileo?
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderGood point. The only Christians that responded to my thread were Coconut, who agreed with me, and Ivanhoe, who didn't challenge me.
Somebody's gotta do it since you members of the mainstream Christian faiths never bother to point out the grave doctrinal errors the fundies like BF, RBHILL, Darfius, etc. spew forth everyday in this forum. Why is that, Ivanh ...[text shortened]... dn't you be defending the faith from such errors and blasphemies?
Maybe that means that despite your beliefs, Christians really do agree with me and you are mistaken?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungSee http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=21102 for RBHILL's reasoned and tolerant views of the Roman Catholic Church.
RBHill of course. He represents an anti-Catholic form of Christianity. I think. Or is it only Darfius that thinks the Catholics are the new Evil Empire?