16 Nov '10 05:11>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut not according to you, a member of the Christian religion. You said quite clearly that the jehovahs witnesses are a religion on their own. I guess you may contest the right to us the 'Christian' name, but you did not attempt to use it yourself in your earlier post.
firstly i am a Christian for I follow the teaching of the Christ,
... secondly the post is specifically made with regard tio Islam, and whether or not its a force for peace.
I am aware of that.
If you wish to discuss Christianity then start another thread.
I wish to discuss whether it is meaningful to discuss whether a religion as a whole can be given descriptions such as 'a religion of peace'.
I propose that regardless of what other religious movements are doing, regardless of what individual Muslims may appear to be and regardless of political rhetoric, it can be proven that Islam is a force not for peace but of war and suppression.
Well then prove it. So far, you haven't done much in that line.
The example was given to illustrate that a judiciary and a government agency, under the influence of Islamists may indeed, perpetrate atrocities against innocents on the flimsiest basis while maintaining that it is proper and correct to do so.
But what conclusion can one draw about the religion as a whole from that example. Why cant the same conclusion be made about Christianity given the equivalent examples from that religion?
Such an environment of fear ensuing from a lack of transparency (you cannot speak against the religion)
As already pointed out, Christians have had death penalties for blasphemy. My own ancestors were quakers and they were jailed for refusing to go to Church. They also refused to swear on the Bible and address the Judge with a fanciful title.