21 Sep '19 06:57>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
@philokalia saidSo no problems with 1 Timothy 2:8–14?
Yes, completely.
I affirm the fact that there should be no women Priests or Bishops -- which is the only significant distinction that actually exists.
@fmf saidNo, it has to do with fundamental differences in temperament that have huge influences on the behavior and attitudes of men and women -- something demonstrated across cultures and socieites.
Is it because they have vaginas?
@philokalia saidWhat is the "temperament" issue when it comes to teaching Christian doctrines or delivering a sermon?
No, it has to do with fundamental differences in temperament that have huge influences on the behavior and attitudes of men and women -- something demonstrated across cultures and socieites.
@philokalia saidWhat are the non-physical differences you see in women that make you think they should be submissive and remain quiet in matters to do with religion?
I assume you have a very boomer 1960s & 1970s perspective on this where the only things different about men and women are physical, right? What are your thoughts on it?
@philokalia saidYes. I believe that women do not need to be submissive and remain quiet in matters to do with religion. I don't think "temperament" is relevant. I think things like child-rearing are a matter of time management and are not an impediment to proselytizing.
I've been kind enough to answer your questions, but I am curious, do you have any position on this?
@philokalia saidI can think of no differences related to temperament, in and of itself, that applies to or affects the propagation of religious belief.
What do you think the differences between male & female temperament are?
@philokalia saidI have met and worked with plenty of women who were uncompromising and domineering.
Priests are also routinely in difficult positions that require being uncompromising and domineering, a trait that is most often seen in cultures.
@philokalia saidIs "men being more detached from their children than women" supposed to be an attribute that makes men more credible in proselytizing? Sounds to me like you have added a tick in the CON column for men, and a tick in the PRO column for women.
Men also are more detached from their children than women, because of this and other psychological factors.
@philokalia saidDo you think women should also be excluded from proactivity and assertiveness in politics because of "fundamental differences in temperament"?
No, it has to do with fundamental differences in temperament that have huge influences on the behavior and attitudes of men and women -- something demonstrated across cultures and socieites.
@fmf saidThis is actually broader than what is prescribed.
Yes. I believe that women do not need to be submissive and remain quiet in matters to do with religion. I don't think "temperament" is relevant. I think things like child-rearing are a matter of time management and are not an impediment to proselytizing.