Islamic justice

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11923701

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11923701

Let he, who is on highest moral, throw the first stone.

I'm sure if I was a devout muslim I'd be bandying about words like "just", "righteous", "loving", etc... just like those who hold fast to fundamentalist Christianity, and justify ancient tales of stonings, slavery, blood sacrifices, etc... so to dignify these events.

I see it as somewhat hypocritical that persons of one barbaric religious persuasion are quick to point out the horrors in another. But then that's just me - an immoral atheist.

Originally posted by Agerg
I'm sure if I was a devout muslim I'd be bandying about words like "just", "righteous", "loving", etc... just like those who hold fast to fundamentalist Christianity, and justify ancient tales of stonings, slavery, blood sacrifices, etc... so to dignify these events.

I see it as somewhat hypocritical that persons of one barbaric religious persuasion are quick to point out the horrors in another. But then that's just me - an immoral atheist.

you people are missing the entire point, did you listen to the whole report, did you notice what the Molvi stated, 'even if the court finds her innocent we shall take the law into our own hands, ' is that just? Apparently so if your a staunch Islamist.

Originally posted by Agerg
I'm sure if I was a devout muslim I'd be bandying about words like "just", "righteous", "loving", etc... just like those who hold fast to fundamentalist Christianity, and justify ancient tales of stonings, slavery, blood sacrifices, etc... so to dignify these events.

I see it as somewhat hypocritical that persons of one barbaric religious persuasion are quick to point out the horrors in another. But then that's just me - an immoral atheist.

we are Christians, you might take note of the fact, we do not practice stoning, slavery or blood sacrifice! your point is therefore double triple hyper concentrated straw and moot to boot!

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Let he, who is on highest moral, throw the first stone.

that would of course be you then? are you condoning the action? you certainly haven't condemned it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11923701

I would be more than glad to brake Molvi's cell and to let his spirit break free

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
we are Christians, you might take note of the fact, we do not practice stoning, slavery or blood sacrifice!

You do not practice it, but neither do you claim it was morally wrong for the Jews to practice it in the past when instructed to do so by God. Therefore you are being hypocritical if you criticize Muslims for practicing such acts as instructed by God in the present day.

Originally posted by black beetle
I would be more than glad to brake Molvi's cell and to let his spirit break free

so me!

Originally posted by twhitehead
You do not practice it, but neither do you claim it was morally wrong for the Jews to practice it in the past when instructed to do so by God. Therefore you are being hypocritical if you criticize Muslims for practicing such acts as instructed by God in the present day.

yes but i don't believe Islam is from God, i believe it is a lie, secondly i do not condone what was practised by the ancient Hebrews i merely point out that I am not in a position to question God, making your statement the same as Agers, straw! Lastly i am not criticising the Islamists for wishing to put to death a person who may or may not have transgressed their laws, i am criticising them for the injustice of condemning someone regardless of the law for they are blinded by their hatred and intolerance, perhaps this escaped your acute powers of observation in the previous posts i made in this thread, who can say, coffee anyone!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
that would of course be you then? are you condoning the action? you certainly haven't condemned it.

No no, I wouldn't throw the firt stone. Ever in my life.

What I tried to say is that every religion, every religous movement, every denomination, and, finally, every individual, who is wothout guilt in every way, can throw the first stone stone.

So, you see, I am not an exception. Are you? Your denomination? Your religious movement? Your religion? If you say 'no', then we agree, and I think you've understood my point.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
No no, I wouldn't throw the firt stone. Ever in my life.

What I tried to say is that every religion, every religous movement, every denomination, and, finally, every individual, who is wothout guilt in every way, can throw the first stone stone.

So, you see, I am not an exception. Are you? Your denomination? Your religious movement? Your religion? If you say 'no', then we agree, and I think you've understood my point.

that is a Christian principle, these are Islamists, Islam has no concept of either forgiveness nor of casting the first stone, its emphasis is purely on retribution.

Of course there are literally millions of Muslims who dont live like that, they live meaningful, intelligent, rich lives.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
that is a Christian principle, these are Islamists, Islam has no concept of either forgiveness nor of casting the first stone, its emphasis is purely on retribution.

And you say the Christian religion have?

As long as the Old Testament is included by the christian holy scriptures, you are wrong. Condemning of the homosexuals for one, the forgiveness of Eve which is the base of the today's partiarcate, the glorification of war and violence, etc. Would you want me to go on?

May I remind you of the Spanish inquisition? The genocide of the Amazonian peoples? The crucades?

But you are right in the forgiveness of the ongoing child molestation of priests and spiritual leaders. They are forgived.

(Not personal, mind you, not personal)

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Of course there are literally millions of Muslims who dont live like that, they live meaningful, intelligent, rich lives.

there are equally millions who do not.