Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow
That is because the one true religion of Spaghetti and Pulsar Activating Meatballs (SPAM) has kept the flying spaghetti monster sect out of schools. The holy trinity of spaghetti, meatballs, and the omnipresent sauce will prevail. If you aren't aware, ID is passed off as a new idea, it isn't specifically about the christian god. It has had no mor ...[text shortened]... roved it should be taught as the long standing and widely accepted scientific theory that it is.
RE: "If you aren't aware, ID is passed off as a new idea, it isn't specifically about the christian god."
Formost, I am well aware that their exist concepts of ID that are not tied to the Christian god. I have never claimed otherwise. I am well aware of how SOME proponents of ID are presenting the theory these days. Why would you think otherwise?
RE: "It has had no more influence on history than the FSM."
I gather from your statement here that no culture based around a theology of ID has made any influence on history. I feel no need to debate this, as it is as absurd a notion as I have heard in quite some time. Perhaps this is not what you meant by your statement. Feel free to expound for my clarification.
RE: "Religion should not ever be taught in public schools."
Why? Not PC?
RE: "I have no problem with taking your kids to church or whatever, but lets not try to discredit science in general in the science classroom."
Going to church, not going to church, believing in anything lacking in empirical evidence (FSM not withstanding) has nothing to do with the matter. Belief in such a thing does not necessitate any sort of descredit to science. Teaching subjects which are not scientific does not necessitate the discredit of science. What next, no art class?
What's this about the "science classroom"!? As to where I think ID should be taught, please refer to the last 30 post I've made on the subject this month, as I refuse to repeat myself again on this matter.
RE: "Science should always be looked at and theories discarded if they no longer fit the evidence suffciently, but this is not yet the case with evolution, and until it is disproved it should be taught as the long standing and widely accepted scientific theory that it is."
Well, we do agree on something. π
Seriously, we are some so afraid of ID being taught in schools in an appropriate context? Why must ID and evolution be considered conflicting theories? Evolution is the culmination of our science, ID the greater part of our historical beliefs. I want my kids to know about BOTH!
Best Regards,
Omnislash