1. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    05 Nov '11 14:36
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    I'm not sure what any of that has do with what we were discussing. America was not founded to be a Christian nation, you're only response to my rebuttal was 'well, that's what a lot of people here believe'.
    That is what our founding fathers believed and their purpose for freedom
    of religion was mainly concerned with escaping the restrictions of the
    Church of England so that they would be free to practice Christianity as
    they pleased. It was basically about freedom to practice Christianity and
    no other religion came into consideration at that time.
  2. Standard memberProper Knob
    Cornovii
    North of the Tamar
    Joined
    02 Feb '07
    Moves
    53689
    05 Nov '11 14:48
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    That is what our founding fathers believed and their purpose for freedom
    of religion was mainly concerned with escaping the restrictions of the
    Church of England so that they would be free to practice Christianity as
    they pleased. It was basically about freedom to practice Christianity and
    no other religion came into consideration at that time.
    You are so clueless Ron it's unbelievable -

    "the government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian Religion."


    Does that ring any bells?
  3. PenTesting
    Joined
    04 Apr '04
    Moves
    249834
    05 Nov '11 15:011 edit
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    You are so clueless Ron it's unbelievable -

    "the government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian Religion."


    Does that ring any bells?
    Its nice to say that but the truth of the matter is that the prevailing religious beliefs of a society influences the laws of a country. The teachings of Islam finds its way into the laws of the Muslim countries eg the death penalty for adultery. In India becuase of Hinduism, it is illegal to kill a cow in many states. Do you think its any different in Christian countries?
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    05 Nov '11 15:19
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    You are so clueless Ron it's unbelievable -

    "the government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian Religion."


    Does that ring any bells?
    No. Another one of your lies.
  5. Standard memberProper Knob
    Cornovii
    North of the Tamar
    Joined
    02 Feb '07
    Moves
    53689
    05 Nov '11 15:33
    Originally posted by Rajk999
    Its nice to say that but the truth of the matter is that the prevailing religious beliefs of a society influences the laws of a country. The teachings of Islam finds its way into the laws of the Muslim countries eg the death penalty for adultery. In India becuase of Hinduism, it is illegal to kill a cow in many states. Do you think its any different in Christian countries?
    That maybe case, but the Founding Fathers in no way intended America to be a Christian nation as Ron alleges. In fact, looking at quotes from these men indicates they had some quite disparaging points of view about Christianity.
  6. Standard memberProper Knob
    Cornovii
    North of the Tamar
    Joined
    02 Feb '07
    Moves
    53689
    05 Nov '11 15:33
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    No. Another one of your lies.
    Article 11 - Treaty of Tripoli.

    I suggest you go and read up.
  7. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    05 Nov '11 17:13
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    Article 11 - Treaty of Tripoli.

    I suggest you go and read up.
    This is a diplomatic effort to assure a Muslim country that we wished to make
    a treaty with that our federal government would not use the religion of
    Christianity to make any decisions regarding the treaty as Muslim governments
    often do. It is clear they must have been concerned that we were a Christian
    nation and that we would also use religion to interpret the treaty.

    Some religious spokesmen such as David Barton claim variously that — despite
    unanimous ratification by the U.S. Senate in English — the text which appears
    as Article 11 in the English translation does not appear in the Arabic text of
    the treaty, that though the English phrase is not an untrue statement since
    it is referring to the federal government, a number of the founders described
    America as a Christian nation, or that the quotation is based on an incomplete
    reading of Article 11.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli
  8. Standard memberProper Knob
    Cornovii
    North of the Tamar
    Joined
    02 Feb '07
    Moves
    53689
    05 Nov '11 17:541 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    This is a diplomatic effort to assure a Muslim country that we wished to make
    a treaty with that our federal government would not use the religion of
    Christianity to make any decisions regarding the treaty as Muslim governments
    often do. It is clear they must have been concerned that we were a Christian
    nation and that we would also use religion to inter ...[text shortened]... based on an incomplete
    reading of Article 11.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli
    I know what it is. The text is there for all to be read.

    Now about that accusation of lying. Are you going to apologise?
  9. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    05 Nov '11 18:17
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    I know what it is. The text is there for all to be read.

    Now about that accusation of lying. Are you going to apologise?
    I do not believe you meant to lie. So yes, I will apologize for that.
    However, half-truths and not presenting the whole truth can appear
    as a lie. Many of the cults take statements in the Holy Bible out of
    context and it appears to say what they claim it says. That is the
    same as presenting half-truths and not presenting the whole truth.
    In the end it becomes as a lie.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree