Jesus Camp closed

Jesus Camp closed

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
11 Nov 06

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003365311_jesuscamp08.html

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
15 Nov 06

This bit amused me greatly:

[Haggard] tells the vast audience, "We don't have to debate about what we should think about homosexual activity. It's written in the Bible."
Then Haggard looks into the camera and says kiddingly: "I think I know what you did last night," drawing laughs from the crowd. "If you send me a thousand dollars, I won't tell your wife."

Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
This bit amused me greatly:

[Haggard] tells the vast audience, "We don't have to debate about what we should think about homosexual activity. It's written in the Bible."
Then Haggard looks into the camera and says kiddingly: "I think I know what you did last night," drawing laughs from the crowd. "If you send me a thousand dollars, I won't tell your wife."
I'm growing weary of all this love and forgiveness. If it is written in the Bible, I want to know when the stoning will commence.

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by kirksey957
I'm growing weary of all this love and forgiveness. If it is written in the Bible, I want to know when the stoning will commence.
Are you volunteering?

Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by lucifershammer
Are you volunteering?
No as I don't be;ieve all of the Bible is relevent unlike Ted Haggard.

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by kirksey957
No as I don't be;ieve all of the Bible is relevent unlike Ted Haggard.
Christ himself never condemned stoning as a punishment.

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by lucifershammer
Christ himself never condemned stoning as a punishment.
He never condemned the use of condoms either.

What happened to the rest of his message that contradicts such strong punishments?

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by Palynka
He never condemned the use of condoms either.

What happened to the rest of his message that contradicts such strong punishments?
He did condemn divorce and adultery, though.

What happened to the rest of his message that contradicts such strong punishments?

His message was one of forgiveness, not turning a blind eye.

There's a difference.

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
15 Nov 06
2 edits

Originally posted by lucifershammer
He did condemn divorce and adultery, though.

[b]What happened to the rest of his message that contradicts such strong punishments?


His message was one of forgiveness, not turning a blind eye.

There's a difference.[/b]
Where's the forgiveness in stoning? Sounds pretty unrelenting to me.

Edit - Notice that my mention of condoms (sex and adultery) isn't without purpose.

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by Palynka
Where's the forgiveness in stoning? Sounds pretty unrelenting to me.
There is no forgiveness in stoning. The point I am making is that Jesus does not challenge its justice or, to put it another way, he does not say that the crime for which one is being stoned is not a crime or a sin.

(Not sure what you raised condoms for.)

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
15 Nov 06
1 edit

Originally posted by lucifershammer
There is no forgiveness in stoning. The point I am making is that Jesus does not challenge its justice or, to put it another way, he does not say that the crime for which one is being stoned is not a crime or a sin.

(Not sure what you raised condoms for.)
Well there would sure be a lot less stonings if only those without sin could do them, wouldn't there?

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by no1marauder
Well there were sure be a lot less stonings if only those without sin could do them, wouldn't there?
Huh?

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by no1marauder
Well there were sure be a lot less stonings if only those without sin could do them, wouldn't there?
Exactly my point.

"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her"

Do you think he meant that there is someone out there who could have been the first?

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
15 Nov 06
2 edits

Originally posted by lucifershammer
Huh?
Have you ever read the Bible, LH?

John 8: 3-11

3 And the scribes and the Pharisees bring a woman taken in adultery; and having set her in the midst,

4 they say unto him, Teacher, this woman hath been taken in adultery, in the very act.

5 Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such: what then sayest thou of her?

6 And this they said, trying him, that they might have whereof to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground.

7 But when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

8 And again he stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground.

9 And they, when they heard it, went out one by one, beginning from the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman, where she was, in the midst.

10 And Jesus lifted up himself, and said unto her, Woman, where are they? did no man condemn thee?

11 And she said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said, Neither do I condemn thee: go thy way; from henceforth sin no more.

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
15 Nov 06

Originally posted by Palynka
Exactly my point.

"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her"

Do you think he meant that there is someone out there who could have been the first?
He could have done it himself, but decided not to. That's also quite telling.