1. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    23 Dec '18 05:431 edit
    @ghost-of-a-duke said
    In court, Mandela said clearly that 'he' did not view his actions as terrorism. For you to say this is neither here nor there when it completely refutes Hammond's assertion just goes to show what a complete lack of integrity you have as a poster.
    Public acts of violence constitute terrorism regardless of what you or Mandela may say about this. What Mandela pleaded guilty to was decided by a court of law to be terrorism.
  2. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    23 Dec '18 05:51
    @wolfgang59 said
    No.
    Sunday schools were begun to indoctrinate the young.

    If literacy was the aim why did it take the Church 1700 years to start?
    Why did Christianity not want the bible translated into local languages?
    Why was the printing press and printing of bibles viewed as dangerous to the Church?

    Read some history instead of lies from a South African White Supremacist.
    I see you have shifted the goal posts now that you can’t back up your Ghandi comments.
  3. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    23 Dec '18 05:54
    @dj2becker said
    I see you have shifted the goal posts now that you can’t back up your Ghandi comments.
    No.
    Just highlighting another piece of nonsense from your original post.
  4. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    23 Dec '18 05:55
    @dj2becker said
    Public acts of violence constitute terrorism regardless of what you or Mandela may say about this. What Mandela pleaded guilty to was decided by a court of law to be terrorism.
    No he did not.
    That has been shown to you very clearly.
  5. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    23 Dec '18 06:271 edit
    @wolfgang59 said
    No he did not.
    That has been shown to you very clearly.
    NATO seems to agree with Hammond on the issue that public acts of violence constitute terrorism which is what Mandela admitted to.

    So much for people writing EVERYTHING in an autobiography.
  6. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    23 Dec '18 07:09
    @wolfgang59 said
    No.
    Just highlighting another piece of nonsense from your original post.
    Back up your Ghandi claim or withdraw it.
  7. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    23 Dec '18 07:46
    @dj2becker said
    NATO seems to agree with Hammond on the issue that public acts of violence constitute terrorism which is what Mandela admitted to.

    So much for people writing EVERYTHING in an autobiography.
    Hammond claims that Mandela said that he (Mandela) committed acts of terrorism.

    We are not debating whether or not Mandela committed such acts.
    We are not debating what others call what Mandela admitted to.
  8. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    23 Dec '18 07:48
    @dj2becker said
    Back up your Ghandi claim or withdraw it.
    You are claiming that Hammond was not lying when
    he said Ghandi had sex with his sister. It is for you to prove.

    If I claim you had sex with your sister, how
    would you disprove it? (Assuming it is untrue.).
  9. SubscriberGhost of a Duke
    Resident of Planet X
    The Ghost Chamber
    Joined
    14 Mar '15
    Moves
    28720
    23 Dec '18 09:40
    @wolfgang59 said
    Hammond claims that Mandela said that he (Mandela) committed acts of terrorism.

    We are not debating whether or not Mandela committed such acts.
    We are not debating what others call what Mandela admitted to.
    I don't think becker's brain is capable of computing that. (Genuinely).
  10. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    23 Dec '18 10:28
    @ghost-of-a-duke said
    I don't think becker's brain is capable of computing that. (Genuinely).
    Yes - perhaps I give him too much credit.
  11. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    23 Dec '18 14:53
    @wolfgang59 said
    You are claiming that Hammond was not lying when
    he said Ghandi had sex with his sister. It is for you to prove.

    If I claim you had sex with your sister, how
    would you disprove it? (Assuming it is untrue.).
    First you need to prove that Hammond said that I have never personally heard him say it.
  12. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    23 Dec '18 14:581 edit
    @wolfgang59 said
    Hammond claims that Mandela said that he (Mandela) committed acts of terrorism.

    We are not debating whether or not Mandela committed such acts.
    We are not debating what others call what Mandela admitted to.
    You are just using word play to try to turn Hammond into a liar because you can’t handle what is written in the OP. Public violence is terrorism. End of story.
  13. SubscriberGhost of a Duke
    Resident of Planet X
    The Ghost Chamber
    Joined
    14 Mar '15
    Moves
    28720
    23 Dec '18 15:33
    @dj2becker said
    You are just using word play to try to turn Hammond into a liar because you can’t handle what is written in the OP. Public violence is terrorism. End of story.
    Just to clarify, were the Suffragettes terrorists?

    And what about Peter, cutting off the servant's ear in an attempt to prevent the arrest of Jesus? Was he a terrorist too?
  14. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    23 Dec '18 19:17
    @ghost-of-a-duke said
    Just to clarify, were the Suffragettes terrorists?

    And what about Peter, cutting off the servant's ear in an attempt to prevent the arrest of Jesus? Was he a terrorist too?
    If they employed the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims then yes.
    If not, no.
  15. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    23 Dec '18 19:26
    @dj2becker said
    You are just using word play to try to turn Hammond into a liar because you can’t handle what is written in the OP. Public violence is terrorism. End of story.
    What is written in the opening post is mainly nonsense.
    (I have highlighted several points which you cannot respond to.)

    The icing on the cake was that it was written by a known liar,
    white supremacist and former army sniper who now calls
    himself "Dr" without any qualifications who is trying to make
    a quick buck by pandering to a moronic minority of Christians
    eager to lap up his stories.

    You are the one who posted the nonsense and insist we
    accept it as true unless we can prove otherwise?!? Nuts.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree