Originally posted by @eladarWait.....wut?
Here is the proof...
Matthew 13
Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them.
I thought Jesus was a Marxist and wanted to empower the state to take care of the poor.
Separation of church and state? I don't think so.
Burn those heretics!!! ðŸ˜
Originally posted by @eladarAre you admitting that Republicans are all about taking from the poor and giving to the rich, sort of like a reverse Robin Hood?
Here is the proof...
Matthew 13
Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them.
Originally posted by @eladarI don't think Jesus would join a party, but he would vote for the party that would most closely be aligned with his will.
Here is the proof...
Matthew 13
Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them.
And before anyone jumps to conclusions, he can distinguish between the real poor and the lazy. He would also not break civil law and tell people to go into a country illegally.
Originally posted by @checkbaiterYou think Jesus would choose the lesser of two evils? If you do that you choose evil.
I don't think Jesus would join a party, but he would vote for the party that would most closely be aligned with his will.
And before anyone jumps to conclusions, he can distinguish between the real poor and the lazy. He would also not break civil law and tell people to go into a country illegally.
Originally posted by @checkbaiterI would call a no vote letting the dead worry about Caesar.
What would you call a "no vote"? I think it would be worse.