Originally posted by sonhouseNo, it's a place you go to dispense with "false memories" and internalize the equivalent to "2+2=5" so that you can surrender your intellect to the authority's false dogma and conform. The more blatant the false dogma, the deeper the surrender. Does the Museum's visitor centre serve Victory Gin I wonder.
Dinosaurs with me, taking the title a bit literally?
13 Jun 12
Originally posted by sonhousenever before have i seen a people build a monument to their stupidity.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/06/12/national/a131828D55.DTL
If you notice towards the end of the article it says they spent a half mil on just advertising.
That is so sick. Not caring about advancing science but in destroying it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo I gather you are also not interested in advancing scientific knowledge but only in destroying whole sciences with 6 generations of scientists giving their life works to such sciences and coming up with solid evidence along the way, creationists nipping at their heels like little chihuahuas barking and biting, thinking they are actually doing damage. Nothing could be further from the truth. They are still chihuahua's just impressing all the other chihuahua's with their fierceness.
atheistic art is in its infancy, give it time.
Originally posted by sonhouseI have no idea what you are talking about I am not a young earth creationist and I
So I gather you are also not interested in advancing scientific knowledge but only in destroying whole sciences with 6 generations of scientists giving their life works to such sciences and coming up with solid evidence along the way, creationists nipping at their heels like little chihuahuas barking and biting, thinking they are actually doing damage. Noth ...[text shortened]... h. They are still chihuahua's just impressing all the other chihuahua's with their fierceness.
accept all empirical science.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLOL!!!!!
I have no idea what you are talking about I am not a young earth creationist and I
accept all empirical science.
Says the man who believes in a literal interpretation of Adam Eve, a literal interpretation of the Biblical flood story and who also denies evolution.
You're on a roll tonight Rob.
Originally posted by sonhouseDavid doesn't have to hit Goliath Evolution with every stone. One stone in the right spot will do. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
So I gather you are also not interested in advancing scientific knowledge but only in destroying whole sciences with 6 generations of scientists giving their life works to such sciences and coming up with solid evidence along the way, creationists nipping at their heels like little chihuahuas barking and biting, thinking they are actually doing damage. Noth ...[text shortened]... h. They are still chihuahua's just impressing all the other chihuahua's with their fierceness.
Originally posted by Proper KnobHe believes whatever the Watchtower tells him to believe. They have to stick together even when they are wrong. He should listen to the truth from me.
LOL!!!!!
Says the man who believes in a literal interpretation of Adam Eve, a literal interpretation of the Biblical flood story and who also denies evolution.
You're on a roll tonight Rob.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Glory be to God!
14 Jun 12
Originally posted by RJHindsi'm reminded of a comical scene in starwars VI, during the battle for endor where one of the ewoks hits himself with the stone-sling.
David doesn't have to hit Goliath Evolution with every stone. One stone in the right spot will do. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
that's the stone in the right spot!
Originally posted by sonhouseThey are interesting in the truth in science and not the fairy tale for grownups that evolution is the way it all happened. Long, long, ago - billions of years - in a far away land the failry tale for grownups begins and ends with the frog turned into a handsome prince.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/06/12/national/a131828D55.DTL
If you notice towards the end of the article it says they spent a half mil on just advertising.
That is so sick. Not caring about advancing science but in destroying it.