02 Mar '14 13:52>
C'mon jaywill. Instead of addressing the germane point of my post, you went off on a tangent, made things up in your mind and addressed your own thoughts. As such, I'm not going to address much of what you've written here.
C'mon ToO, think exactly like me and have exactly the same opinion as me. It is, afterall, only normal. C'mon there.
I am still puzzled why you said you had no idea of what I was talking about when I summarized your other post. I thought you had amnesia or sleep walking. Oh well.
Actually what I'm telling you is that while He walked the Earth, JESUS repeatedly emphasized that HIS followers must keep HIS word, follow HIS commandments, etc.
Do you mean "Keep HIS word" and not the word He taught the apostles ?
Jesus certainly prayed not only for His immediate 12 disciples but for those who believed in Him because of their word. C'mon.
"And I do not ask concerning these only, but also concerning those who believe into Me through their word ..." (John 17:20)
Jesus taught that we had to humble ourselves and receive even a little child who came in His name, how much more then His sent apostles ?
"And whoever receives one such little choid because of My name, receives Me." (Matt. 18:5)
Since Jesus didn't WRITE anything, we are necessarily dependent upon His apostles. So why are you attempting to turn me away from the apostles in the name of keeping "HIS" word ?
Jesus told the disciples that THEY would carry out His message, all of it, to the world.
"And He said to them, Thus it is written, that the Christ would suffer and rise up from the dead on the third day, And that repentance for forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in His name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem." (Luke 24:46,47)
This is why we have the book of Acts. We can see the continuation of Christ's ministry through those whom He sent. C'mon, why are you trying to turn me away from His apostles under the guise of following "HIS" word ?
Acts says that the saints in the first genuine local church in Jerusalem continued steadfastly in the teaching and fellowship "of the apostles".
"And they continued steadfastly in the teaching and the fellowship of the apostles, in the breaking of bread and the prayers." (Acts 2:42)
Am I saying that the apostles were perfect and made no mistakes ? No, not at all. But by and large they balanced each other out, and we can see the seamless continuation of the best of Christ's earthly ministry continuing with the Holy Spirit in and upon the apostles and disciples.
Stephan was a faithful witness to the teaching of Jesus and became the first martyr because of it (Acts 7). He was not of the original 12 but was a deacon. His life manifested his faith and intouchness with the ascended Christ.
Priscilla and Acquilla were able to adjust and correct deficiencies in the teaching of the apostle Apollos .
[b]"And this man [Apollos] began to speak boldly in the synagogue. and when Priscilla and Aquila heard him, they took him to themselves and and expounded the way of God to him more accurately." (Acts 18:26)
The point here is that the disciples could teach accurately what Jesus taught. And they could also recognize deficiencies. They were 2000 some years closer to the events then you and I were.
I think your emphasis on keeping "HIS" words is, seems to be an insinuation that we discard all but the red letters that you approve of in the synoptics.
Jesus said, in the red letters, that He would give the persecuted apostles what they should say and what they should speak. So why should I not listen closely?
Luke 21:15 - "For I will give you a mouth of wisdom and wisdom which all those opposing you will not be able to resist or refute."
Matt. 10:19 - "for it will be given to you in that hour what you should speak; For you are not the ones speaking, but the Spirit of your Father is the One speaking in you."
Mark 13:11b - " ... but whatever is given to you in that hour, speak that, for it is not you who are speaking; but the Holy Spirit."
Since Jesus Christ, and the Father and the Holy Spirit (as seen above), gave the apostles a mouth of wisdom what to speak which could not be refuted, especially under sore persecution, then why are you trying to convince me that I should discard the apostles ?
C'mon ToO. Your problem doesn't seem to be with the disciples but with Jesus Christ Himself.
sonship:
The oldest New Testament writings we have are the letters of Paul. Though historically the Gospel records happened prior to Paul's ministry, the writings of Paul are older documents.
Paul presents what HE RECEIVED and PASSED ON in the book which even critical scholars attribute to Paul, First Corinthians.
...
ToO:
This is exactly what Kierkegaard was talking about in the following:
Paul draws attention away from imitating Christ and fixes attention on the death of Christ The Atoner.
He does not. In fact He teaches of both. Here he told the disciples to be imitators of himself as he is of Jesus Christ -
"Be imitators of me, as I also am of Christ." (1 Cor. 11:1)
He also tells the Ephesians to be imitators of God:
"Be therefore imitators of God, as beloved children." (Eph. 5:1)
He also tells the Philippians to have the mind of Christ -
"Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, ... " (Phil. 2:5)
Because as it should be Paul was living what he was preaching, he could exhort the believers to be imitators of himself -
"Be imitators together of me, brothers, and observe those who thus walk even as you have us as a pattern." (Phil. 3:17)
Notice that he includes "us" meaning he did not consider himself the ONLY one who was so walking in Christ and experiencing His reality.
Paul absolutely pointed his audience to Jesus Christ and did not neglect the Atoner. For only as the guilt of sin is removed can we have fellowship with God. And only looking away from ourselves to Jesus can we gain the victory through what He is.
Other comments will have to wait for latter. Time to go and enjoy my Lord Jesus with the saints.