03 Nov '16 20:04>1 edit
One of the things about "The Evolution of Morality" I was left with was I
got the feeling that with the evolution of morality struck me more like the
second hand of a clock that never stopped moving. It even seemed that
the full point of it or the book was remain skeptical of any standard even
if it came from some thoughtful stance that might even be thought of as
coming from the evolution of morality.
That it would have to be at odds of any stance on morality that looked like
an unmoving plumb line, or a static or near static view on morality.
got the feeling that with the evolution of morality struck me more like the
second hand of a clock that never stopped moving. It even seemed that
the full point of it or the book was remain skeptical of any standard even
if it came from some thoughtful stance that might even be thought of as
coming from the evolution of morality.
That it would have to be at odds of any stance on morality that looked like
an unmoving plumb line, or a static or near static view on morality.