Spirituality
12 Feb 15
Originally posted by OdBodMolecules which have not evolved complex interdependencies and symbioses.
I think you will find that the precursor for life is suggested to be self replicating molecules, not fully formed cells.
And, the primitive oceans, [I'm guessing here] probably had a slightly larger
volume and thus greater possibility of unlikely events occurring than his test tube...
Originally posted by KellyJaythat guy is spot on. i emptied a sack full of the correct nutrients to make life all over a tissue once.....and guess what? no life has evolved on the tissue!!!! or the sock!! or the floor!!! or my pants!!! or that picture of hillary clinton (dont ask, i was in a bad place).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2NhTS1-QIc
Actually it is 2 minutes and 1 second 🙂
Originally posted by SuzianneIf you were sane, you would have looked at it before opening your big mouth.
OK, the 'rational' card comes out. Anyone for 'sane'?
Mind you, I haven't even looked at it, but I get the gist of this post.
The fact is that Kelly is smarter than to think that video made a rational argument, so the question is why did he post it? He won't tell me because although he is smart he is a little childish and has been giving me the silent treatment ever since I called him out for his view on starlight.
Originally posted by stellspalfieYeah, well I had to cut down a tree in my yard and we chopped it all up and then thought better of it but we couldn't make a tree out of the scraps either.
that guy is spot on. i emptied a sack full of the correct nutrients to make life all over a tissue once.....and guess what? no life has evolved on the tissue!!!! or the sock!! or the floor!!! or my pants!!! or that picture of hillary clinton (dont ask, i was in a bad place).
Another example of weaponized pseudo-science. Gee, I ran over this dog and it was in pieces and I can't for the life of me make it alive again.
I wonder how many people fall for this scam?