13 Mar '05 05:09>
Originally posted by DarfiusHmm...I'm not so sure about this.
I think mammals caring for their offspring could better be described as "duty". Animals care about their offspring surviving, yes, but they could care less if their offspring is happy.
I do not believe that love is peculiar to the human species. Bennett
might know more about this than I do, but I am pretty sure that we
observe love in other species, like apes, elephants, and dolphins. It
doesn't have the same manifestation as ours does, but elementally
it is there.
Personally, I am in agreement with Rwingett. I think that the 'duty'
you describe is the 'primal urge,' so to speak (we see it in many 'higher'
creatures, including a few reptiles, many birds, and most mammals).
In order to perpetuate the species, one must ensure that some offspring
develop into reproductive adults.
'Love' is a social reinforcement of that 'primal urge,' I think. As the
animals get 'higher,' we see a longer childhood development requiring
more nurture. 'Love' is partially a biological construct which ensures
that we see to our offspring. The other part is social, and, at this point,
I suspect the larger part.
Again, this is my 'lay' guess. A biologist would have to give the technical
mumbo jumbo to explain it.
Nemesio