Making God and Man One

Through Christ’s work in His incarnation not only was God brought into man, but God was also made one with man. Christ has accomplished the great work of making God one with man, of making the two—God and man—one person with two natures, divinity and humanity. How this was accomplished we cannot explain. Nevertheless, the Bible reveals clearly that through Christ’s incarnation God in His divinity was made one with man in humanity. The two essences of divinity and humanity were made into a single entity without a third essence being produced. In this one entity the two essences of divinity and humanity are the original essences. Even after being mingled in the person of the God-man, they are distinct; there is no mixture. God is still God, and man is still man, yet they have become one person, Christ, the God-man, in whom God is one with man. No one can explain this adequately.

Christ was conceived of the Holy Spirit with the divine essence and born of a human virgin with a human essence. We use the word “essence” in a strong sense to denote something even more intrinsic than nature. The essence is the intrinsic constituent of a certain substance. Christ was conceived of the Holy Spirit not only with the divine nature but with the divine essence. Therefore, He has two essences, the divine and the human. These two essences were not merely added together; they were mingled together. In the conception of Christ the divine essence and the human essence were mingled.


It is crucial that we have the proper understanding of the word “mingle” with respect to Christ’s work of bringing God into man and of making God one with man through His incarnation. We definitely do not use this word to mean that the mingling of divinity with humanity in Christ caused a third nature to be produced, something that is neither divine nor human. To say that with respect to the Lord Jesus the mingling of the divine essence and the human essence produced a third nature, a nature that is neither fully human nor divine, is heretical. We agree with the first definition of mingle given in Webster’s unabridged dictionary: “to combine or join (one thing with another, or two or more things together), especially so that the original elements are distinguishable in the combination.” Hence, to mingle is to combine two or more things together so that the original elements remain distinguishable.

This certainly is the situation regarding Christ as the God-man. Because He was conceived of the divine essence and the human essence, He is the mingling of God and man. But both the divine essence and the human essence remain and are distinguishable. These essences are mingled in Him without producing a third nature. In His one person Christ possesses two essences, and in Him each essence is distinguishable. Therefore, it is altogether accurate to say that the incarnation of Christ was the mingling of God with man. This mingling produced a single person, a divine-human person, the person of the God-man. Although Christ has two essences, He does not have two persons.

The conception of the God-man was God’s incarnation, constituted not only by the divine power but also of the divine essence mingled with the human essence to produce the God-man. Through this great work accomplished by Christ, God was made one with man so that He might be manifested in the flesh (1 Tim. 3:16).

The Trinity is a great mystery. The incarnation is also a great mystery. All genuine Christians, all who hold to the common faith (Titus 1:4), must believe in the Triune God and in Christ’s incarnation. Christ is God made one with man. Although He has both divinity and humanity, He is not two persons. Christ is one person with two essences. Although we cannot explain this adequately, we can enjoy Him as the God-man. In incarnation Christ, the embodiment of the Triune God, accomplished the great work of bringing God into man and of making God one with man.

In His incarnation Christ put man in the flesh upon Himself. This man in the flesh may be likened to a garment. Christ put on this “garment” and wore it. Therefore, while He was living and walking on earth, inwardly He was God, and outwardly He was a man in the flesh, for He wore this man as a garment.

Concerning Christ’s putting on man in the flesh upon Himself, Hebrews 2:14a says, “Since therefore the children have partaken of blood and flesh, He also Himself in like manner shared in the same.” This clearly indicates that Christ became a man in order to partake of blood and flesh. We do not have a Savior who is different in nature from us. No, Christ became exactly the same as we are, except for sin. Christ came in the flesh to be one with us, partaking of blood and flesh.

Christ’s incarnation means that the very God has become flesh. According to John 1:14, the Word, which is God, became flesh. Why did He become flesh? He became flesh so that He might be the same as we are. We are men of blood and flesh, and Christ partook of the same. Therefore, through incarnation He came as a man to our level. Although Christ is God, He came to our level and shared in our nature.

First John 4:2 says, “In this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit which confesses Jesus Christ having come in the flesh is out of God.” Here “spirit” denotes the spirit of a genuine prophet motivated by the Holy Spirit of truth, which confesses the divine conception of Jesus, affirming that He was born as the Son of God. Every such spirit is surely out of God.

Jesus was conceived of the Spirit (Matt. 1:18). To confess Jesus coming in the flesh is to confess that He was divinely conceived to be born as the Son of God (Luke 1:31-35). Because He was conceived of the Spirit to be born in the flesh, the Spirit would never deny that He has come in the flesh through divine conception. Truly, through His work in incarnation Christ became a man in the flesh, putting man in the flesh upon Himself.

Originally posted by sonship

In His incarnation Christ put man in the flesh upon Himself. This man in the flesh may be likened to a garment. Christ put on this “garment” and wore it. Therefore, while He was living and walking on earth, inwardly He was God, and outwardly He was a man in the flesh, for He wore this man as a garment.

Concerning Christ’s putting on man in the fle ...[text shortened]... incarnation Christ became a man in the flesh, putting man in the flesh upon Himself.

Originally posted by checkbaiter
The God I worship is the Creator of the heavens and the earth. He is also the God and Father of The Lord Jesus Christ and is not a man that He should lie.
Jesus however, is completely a man, sinless, who was crucified for the sins of the world and God raised him from the dead.
He has been highly exalted to the position as head of his Church and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
Makes a lot more sense to me.

Originally posted by checkbaiter
The God I worship is the Creator of the heavens and the earth. He is also the God and Father of The Lord Jesus Christ and is not a man that He should lie.
Jesus however, is completely a man, sinless, who was crucified for the sins of the world and God raised him from the dead.
He has been highly exalted to the position as head of his Church and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
Makes a lot more sense to me.

The God I worship is the Creator of the heavens and the earth. He is also the God and Father of The Lord Jesus Christ and is not a man that He should lie.

Jesus however, is completely a man, sinless, who was crucified for the sins of the world and God raised him from the dead.

He has been highly exalted to the position as head of his Church and is seated at the right hand of the Father.

He has been highly exalted to the position as head of his Church and is seated at the right hand of the Father.

Originally posted by josephw
The problem with all of that is that it is extra-Biblical, and nothing more than a commentary with heavy human interpretive nuances all of which are unnecessary since the scripture gives all the information we need in order to understand what God's will and purposes are.

In other words, we have the Word of God and the Holy Spirit, we don't need reams of e Instead of allowing the Word of God to say what it says is why!

The problem with all of that is that it is extra-Biblical,

and nothing more than a commentary with heavy human interpretive nuances all of which are unnecessary since the scripture gives all the information we need in order to understand what God's will and purposes are.

In other words, we have the Word of God and the Holy Spirit, we don't need reams of explanations and interpretations by man. The Word of God defines, interprets and explains itself.

Why else do you think none of us understands the scriptures the same way? Why else is it that there are as many denominations today as there are?

Instead of allowing the Word of God to say what it says is why!

Originally posted by Rajk999
[b]Some years ago I went after the JWs and I got a lot of flack for it but now I see that its accepted and there are now dozens of anti-JW threads around.

Now it seens that our friend Jaywill/Sonship is going down the same road as the JWs. He is in a cult started by Watchman Nee or rather an offshoot of that by someone called Witness Lee. He is getting more even have their own version of the Bible called the Recovery Version.

Originally posted by sonship
Positive testimonials countering Rajk999's vague and slanderous accusations:

http://an-open-letter.org/testimonies/

Originally posted by sonship

The God I worship is the Creator of the heavens and the earth. He is also the God and Father of The Lord Jesus Christ and is not a man that He should lie.

God who never lies was not a man at the time that that passage was spoken in [b](Numbers 23:19) . That was before the Word Who was God and with God became flesh (John 1:1,14) [ ...[text shortened]... the Triune God into His redeemed people.

http://an-open-letter.org/

Originally posted by sonship

The problem with all of that is that it is extra-Biblical,

Please point out what I wrote which is "extra-biblical."

[quote]
and nothing more than a commentary with heavy human interpretive nuances all of which are unnecessary since the scripture gives all the information we need in order to understand what God's will and purposes a ...[text shortened]... ical problem. Can you point one out ?

http://an-open-letter.org/

Originally posted by josephw
[b]"Please point out what I wrote which is "extra-biblical." "

Am I clear?

I will only reply to this statement and disregard the rest so as to make my point pointedly clear. The following statement for example:

Through Christ’s work in His incarnation not only was God brought into man, but God was also made one with man. Christ has accomplished the great work of making God one with man,..

It's twisted. "God...made one with man" is not a scriptural concept, it falls short of what is taught by God's Word concerning our union with God in Christ.

•Christ, the only begotten Son of God (John 1:18; 3:16), even God Himself (John 1:1), became a genuine man through incarnation (John 1:14), having both the divine and human natures (Rom. 9:5; 1 Tim. 2:5), the two natures being combined in one person and being preserved distinctly without confusion or change and without forming a third nature;

There is one more thing. In the statement I quoted above it is said that "through Christ's work in His incarnation..." ; an idea I find most troubling, since it was His work on the cross that accomplished anything in relation to our union with God.

We must adhere to a strick Biblical narrative if we hope to know what God is telling us, otherwise we fall into error.