3 edits
Originally posted by Rajk999To say Jesus speaking of His redemptive death was limited to the 11 redeemed disciples in the privacy of the last supper is crackpot theology. You should repent of teaching this heretical nonsense.
I did agree that Christ said that blood is shed for the remission of sins. The fact is that was said privately to his disciples. In all the multitude of teachings and preachings Christ made all over the NT there is no such recorded statement by Christ to the public.
What Christ and the Apostles said about a million times PUBLICLY is the consequences of si ...[text shortened]... T!
Maybe you should have read the Bible before blindly accepting what your preacher told you.
The blood shedding Redeemer Jesus Christ is referred to as "the Lamb" many times in the concluding book of the Bible - Revelation.
Rev. 5:6;
Rev. 5:8;
Rev. 5:12;
Rev. 6:1;
Rev. 6:16;
Rev. 7:9;
Rev. 7:10;
Rev. 7:14;
Rev. 7:17;
Rev. 12:11;
Rev. 13:8;
Rev. 14:1;
Rev. 14:4; (twice)
Rev. 14:10;
Rev. 15:3;
Rev. 17:14 (twice)
Rev. 19:7;
Rev. 19:9;
Rev. 21:14;
Rev. 21:22;
Rev. 21:23;
Rev. 22:1;
Rev. 22:3
The Redeeming Lamb of God is depicted as quite more universal than just pertaining to the privacy`of the 11 saved disciples at the Lord's Supper.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAll of this still remains without refutation
(Jude 9) But when Michael the archangel had a difference with the Devil and was
disputing about Moses’ body, he did not dare to bring a judgement against him in
abusive terms, but said: “May Jehovah rebuke you.”
(1 Thessalonians 4:16) because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a
commanding call, with an archangel’s voice and wit ...[text shortened]... since his return to heaven where he resides
as the glorified spirit Son of God.
nuff said.
1 edit
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeMy good man look how the measly attempts to discredit my text are smouldering in a heap of twisted carnage littering the forum floor! Why? because truth has a potency all of its own. These other Christians know what I am saying is truth, its like a healing for them, but they do not want to be healed, they would rather stick to their pre christian pagan doctrines and idolatries! Well their house is abandoned to them!
There was me thinking it was 'self-refuting.'
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
All of this still remains without refutation
Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
(Jude 1:9 KJV)
And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
(Philippians 2:11 KJV)
HalleluYaHshua ! Praise the Lord !
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsYet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, [b]The Lord rebuke thee.
(Jude 1:9 KJV)
And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
(Philippians 2:11 KJV)
HalleluYaHshua ! Praise the Lord ![/b]proves nothing and I crow like a cockerel upon the farm fence in the morning
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
proves nothing and I crow like a cockerel upon the farm fence in the morning
1. Michael the archangel tells the Lord to rebuke Satan.
2. Jude says everyone is to confess Jesus Christ is Lord.
3. Peter and Paul calls Jesus our Lord and savior.
Logical conclusions:
1. Michael the archangel is not the Lord.
2. Jesus is the Lord.
3. Jesus is not Michael the archangel.
Originally posted by RJHindsWho made you the forum police?
I have already discussed this in previous threads with robbie and he kept getting amnesia until it got to the point he said he did not want to hear from me about it.
Rajk keeps going off topic. I am ony trying to keep him on topic. He can make another thread for whatever topic he wishes. However, this topic is about Jesus being Michael the archangel. ...[text shortened]... rying to encourage Rajk to confront robbie on that topic only. Maybe robbie will listen to him.
What do you care if people stay on topic? The Jesus/Michael thing is Robbie's bizarre dogma, not Rajk's. You wanna talk about it, talk to Robbie.
Threads get off-topic all the time, in fact it's rare that it does not happen. Deal with it.
Originally posted by SuzianneI did deal with it, my lady. 😏
Who made you the forum police?
What do you care if people stay on topic? The Jesus/Michael thing is Robbie's bizarre dogma, not Rajk's. You wanna talk about it, talk to Robbie.
Threads get off-topic all the time, in fact it's rare that it does not happen. Deal with it.
Originally posted by RJHindsYour lady bwahahaha! I gotta get myself a redneck starter kit to get into this Southern snake dancing mode, maybe a confederate belt buckle, banged up pick up truck and a vehement anti government stance bordering on forming my own private militia.
I did deal with it, my lady. 😏
Originally posted by RJHindslogical conclusions???? bwahahah, of Hinds you jester!1. Michael the archangel tells the Lord to rebuke Satan.
2. Jude says everyone is to confess Jesus Christ is Lord.
3. Peter and Paul calls Jesus our Lord and savior.
Logical conclusions:
1. Michael the archangel is not the Lord.
2. Jesus is the Lord.
3. Jesus is not Michael the archangel.