08 Apr 23
A very informative and objective video on whether Jesus actually existed:
Even though I'm anti-religion I appreciated the thorough evidence he explores for the existence of Jesus and possible counter arguments. It seems most historians agree there the New Testament figure is based on actual person.
I have no argument for or against, just sharing an informative video.
08 Apr 23
@suzianne saidThere are several novels based on this...(and of course the theory is already mentioned in the bible
Easy. Find his burial spot and his body.
09 Apr 23
@fmf saidNo, pinhead. What I was saying, and what divegeester blew right over in his urgency to make fun of me, was that IF you can find his burial site and his body, then he didn't rise from the dead, savvy?
The fact that his "burial spot" is unknown is evidence that Christian claims about his divinity ~ and the supernatural significance of his death described decades later ~ are true? Really?
09 Apr 23
@divegeester saidIt's not my fault that your understanding of English is somewhat sub-par, for an Englishman.
Of course I did; in fact I reread it several times whilst trying to make sense of your reply to him.
@suzianne saidYour reply to FMF makes no sense as rebuttal. Even now you’ve expanded on it, it is still just plain silly. How on earth does the absence of the 2000 year old remains of a Jewish Rabbi in any way whatsoever prove that he rose from the dead?
It's not my fault that your understanding of English is somewhat sub-par, for an Englishman.
Edit: and you calling FMF a “pinhead” and accusing me of not understanding my native language is making you look even more sillierist (sic)
09 Apr 23
@suzianne saidMy post obviously went over your head. I wasn't talking about divegeester. I was replying to your response to my post. I was talking about you think is evidence of Christ's divinity.
No, pinhead. What I was saying, and what divegeester blew right over in his urgency to make fun of me, was that IF you can find his burial site and his body, then he didn't rise from the dead, savvy?
10 Apr 23
@divegeester saidSo you prove me right.
Your reply to FMF makes no sense as rebuttal. Even now you’ve expanded on it, it is still just plain silly. How on earth does the absence of the 2000 year old remains of a Jewish Rabbi in any way whatsoever prove that he rose from the dead?
Edit: and you calling FMF a “pinhead” and accusing me of not understanding my native language is making you look even more sillierist (sic)
You should probably stop now.