@fmf saidClearly, you aren't following, and you clearly don't "savvy".
My post obviously went over your head. I wasn't talking about divegeester. I was replying to your response to my post. I was talking about you think is evidence of Christ's divinity.
Neither does your twin, btw.
@divegeester saidYou are both so obviously trying to make a stupid point here that you can't even see that you're holding the wrong end of the stick, as I've already explained twice now.
How on earth does the absence of the 2000 year old remains of a Jewish Rabbi in any way whatsoever prove that he rose from the dead?
I'm not saying that an absence of remains proves he rose from the dead. How do you not get this? What I said from the beginning is that if one wants to claim that Jesus did NOT rise from the dead, as FMF obviously does, then all you need is a body.
Duh.
10 Apr 23
@suzianne saidIf one wants to claim that Jesus did NOT rise from the dead... then all you need is a body.
You are both so obviously trying to make a stupid point here that you can't even see that you're holding the wrong end of the stick, as I've already explained twice now.
I'm not saying that an absence of remains proves he rose from the dead. How do you not get this? What I said from the beginning is that if one wants to claim that Jesus did NOT rise from the dead, as FMF obviously does, then all you need is a body.
Duh.
This is QAnon-esque thinking.
@fmf saidWhat does this even mean?
If one wants to claim that Jesus did NOT rise from the dead... then all you need is a body.
This is QAnon-esque thinking.
Your motives notwithstanding, you cannot claim my statement is not true.
You clearly just want to argue.
@suzianne saidThe idea that the trite exhortation "Find his burial spot and his body" ~ when we are talking about the corpse of a man about whom no contemporary writers recorded anything, 2,000 years ago ~ is somehow evidence that he was a divine being who rose from the dead, is ludicrous.
Your motives notwithstanding, you cannot claim my statement is not true.
@fmf saidAGAIN, you miss my point entirely.
The idea that the trite exhortation "Find his burial spot and his body" ~ when we are talking about the corpse of a man about whom no contemporary writers recorded anything, 2,000 years ago ~ is somehow evidence that he was a divine being who rose from the dead, is ludicrous.
@divegeester saidHow so? Seriously.
You are being utterly ridiculous with this childish, obtuse and absurd statement.
It seems way more than obvious to me that if you want to claim that someone did NOT rise from the dead, then all you need is their body to prove it.
@suzianne said'We can't find so and so's grave or his corpse from thousands of years ago so he must have risen from the dead '
QAnon? Really? Who is being obtuse, childish and stubborn?
At least I'm working in the realm of the obvious here.
This is quintessentially QAnon-like reasoning and "evidence".