Originally posted by Proper KnobSame as the other. The "Revolution Against Evolution". If you just go there the next section is to long to post. Justy find the Line about "Ancient Ice - 9/19/2003". Plus there are quite a few other subjects to research there too...
And can you reference where you obtained the text also please?!
Originally posted by galveston75what a wonderful site, shall provide much thought for discussion, i am sure, thanks for that Galvo!
Same as the other. The "Revolution Against Evolution". If you just go there the next section is to long to post. Justy find the Line about "Ancient Ice - 9/19/2003". Plus there are quite a few other subjects to research there too...
Originally posted by robbie carrobieInteresting point i found regarding this site. A Dr Jerry Bergman seems to author quite a lot of essays for this site, he is also an ex-JW who has seemingly been disfellowshipped.
what a wonderful site, shall provide much thought for discussion, i am sure, thanks for that Galvo!
Dr. Bergman was brought up as a Jehovah's Witness but seemingly could not abide by its standards. He has now made it his life's work to write rather long and shallow "scholarly" treatises concerning Jehovah's Witnesses and various topics.
http://jehovah.to/gen/freedom/opposers.htm
Food for thought.
Originally posted by galveston75Thanks.
Same as the other. The "Revolution Against Evolution". If you just go there the next section is to long to post. Justy find the Line about "Ancient Ice - 9/19/2003". Plus there are quite a few other subjects to research there too...
Do you want to respnd to my previous post?
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knobyes thanks for alerting us to that Noobster, i would never have known otherwise? he seems to have failed as an 'expert witness', in a case over the contention of a will, in which someone left his estate to the brothers.
Interesting point i found regarding this site. A Dr Jerry Bergman seems to author quite a lot of essays for this site, he is also an ex-JW who has seemingly been disfellowshipped.
Dr. Bergman was brought up as a Jehovah's Witness but seemingly could not abide by its standards. He has now made it his life's work to write rather long and shallow "sch and various topics.
http://jehovah.to/gen/freedom/opposers.htm
Food for thought.
Originally posted by Proper KnobThanks for that info. But his references are still valid...
Interesting point i found regarding this site. A Dr Jerry Bergman seems to author quite a lot of essays for this site, he is also an ex-JW who has seemingly been disfellowshipped.
Dr. Bergman was brought up as a Jehovah's Witness but seemingly could not abide by its standards. He has now made it his life's work to write rather long and shallow "sch ...[text shortened]... and various topics.
http://jehovah.to/gen/freedom/opposers.htm
Food for thought.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLOL G75 is on a roll 🙂 Don't mess with em! That's why I don't cut & paste. Man I've been busy. I can't believe this went over 500. When I get home tonight have to go through all of the post to get caught up.
Galvo dude can you edit it and put it in paragraphs so that its easier on the eyes 🙂
Manny
1 edit
My problem is with "so called creationist" is that if there is scientific evidence that might contradict a long time held position of said creationist they say the evidence is faulty. How about then we just don't know? I'm a creationist but I admit on somethings (we) I just don't know. Age of the earth? really? don't know. I think there is the danger that there is a sort of cult of creationist just as there is with evolutionist not willing to just look at data.
Manny
Originally posted by menace71Are you saying there is a cult of evolutionists not willing to look at the data? Can you back that up in any way? Do you know anyone who believes evolution took place who has refused to look at data? Do you have any data that you believe I or any other 'evolutionist' on this site would refuse to look at?
I think there is the danger that there is a sort of cult of creationist just as there is with evolutionist not willing to just look at data.
Manny
Originally posted by menace71I agree as I had said that a few postings ago. But it usually seems that most evolutionist or as I say, "ones who do not accept God", seem to think that evolution is a fact as it clearly is not. A very old earth is not a fact as they cannot prove that with current dating technics. The flood on the other hand is a fact if ones would only look at the proof the earth presents in a different light. But that causes a problem for them to submit to that possibilty because then the reality of a God gets in their face. So they just keep on trying to defend this theory and try to convience the world that it's true when in fact the evidence is extremely weak at best.
My problem is with "so called creationist" is that if there is scientific evidence that might contradict a long time held position of said creationist they say the evidence is faulty. How about then we just don't know? I'm a creationist but I admit on somethings (we) I just don't know. Age of the earth? really? don't know. I think there is the danger that t ...[text shortened]... ionist just as there is with evolutionist not willing to just look at data.
Manny
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75You really believe what you just said, don't you? Incredible. 🙄 Just out of curiosity, what's your line of work?
I agree as I had said that a few postings ago. But it usually seems that most evolutionist or as I say, "ones who do not accept God", seem to think that evolution is a fact as it clearly is not. A very old earth is not a fact as they cannot prove that with current dating technics. The flood on the other hand is a fact if ones would only look at the proof ...[text shortened]... ry to convience the world that it's true when in fact the evidence is extremely weak at best.