Originally posted by galveston75The flood on the other hand is a fact
I agree as I had said that a few postings ago. But it usually seems that most evolutionist or as I say, "ones who do not accept God", seem to think that evolution is a fact as it clearly is not. A very old earth is not a fact as they cannot prove that with current dating technics. The flood on the other hand is a fact if ones would only look at the proof ...[text shortened]... ry to convience the world that it's true when in fact the evidence is extremely weak at best.
Sorry to sound like a broken record again, but you haven't shown any facts yet.
You are still to produce any evidence as to why there isn't any flood evidence in ice core samples. If you believe the ice caps are only 5,000yrs old i'm still waiting to see some evidence, and we're now nearly 550 posts in.
Originally posted by Proper KnobThis is my answer which I thought as very clear... And it's my final answer.
[b]The flood on the other hand is a fact
Sorry to sound like a broken record again, but you haven't shown any facts yet.
You are still to produce any evidence as to why there isn't any flood evidence in ice core samples. If you believe the ice caps are only 5,000yrs old i'm still waiting to see some evidence, and we're now nearly 550 posts in.[/b]
I agree as I had said that a few postings ago. But it usually seems that most evolutionist or as I say, "ones who do not accept God", seem to think that evolution is a fact as it clearly is not. A very old earth is not a fact as they cannot prove that with current dating technics. The flood on the other hand is a fact if ones would only look at the proof the earth presents in a different light. But that causes a problem for them to submit to that possibilty because then the reality of a God gets in their face. So they just keep on trying to defend this theory and try to convience the world that it's true when in fact the evidence is extremely weak at best.
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75Your answer is about as clear as the mud you can't find evidence for!! So i'll take that as a no.
This is my answer which I thought as very clear... And it's my final answer.
I agree as I had said that a few postings ago. But it usually seems that most evolutionist or as I say, "ones who do not accept God", seem to think that evolution is a fact as it clearly is not. A very old earth is not a fact as they cannot prove that with current dating tech ...[text shortened]... y to convience the world that it's true when in fact the evidence is extremely weak at best.
Why not just say so?!
Originally posted by Rajk999Actually the only thing I'm ashamed of is you and your comments... But let's move on.
No need to be ashamed. Its an honest living.
Christ does not judge anyone by their profession unless you are involved in something illegal, immoral or unethical. So just say what it is and lets move on.