@secondson saidI've been saying that for years about debates....!!!
Nobody's really going to win or lose these debates, but that's not why we're here is it? We're just here sharpening our swords.
-VR
31 Dec 18
@very-rusty saidYou were right! 😂
I've been saying that for years about debates....!!!
-VR
@secondson saidI "can't stand the opposition"? What are you in about? I welcome disagreement and debate.
You're posting in a spirituality forum, but can't stand the opposition to your agnostic atheist perspective, yet you experience personal growth in the process of losing faith as a result of hearing what you can't stand.
@fmf saidNo. Learning to love is.
Well, obviously we all "stop learning" when we die and they bury us in the ground or cremate our remains. The question is: is "learning" the mainstay of living a meaningful life.
That can be read with a variety of inflections. All, I think, are equally valid.
Ah, the beauty of the spoken word! And the gift of writing it to convey meaning of thought and emotion.
Words can kill, or give life.
03 Jan 19
@secondson said"Learning" generally. There's more to life, I think, than "learning to love".
No. Learning to love is.
03 Jan 19
@fmf saidYou asked this question to which I answered specifically: is "learning" the mainstay of living a meaningful life?"
"Learning" generally. There's more to life, I think, than "learning to love".
Learning to love is the mainstay of living a meaningful life.
You are welcomed to disagree, but I won't debate you about it.
03 Jan 19
@secondson saidI see "learning to love" as a part of a more holistic perspective [learning... along with teaching, loving and being loved] on the meaning of life. When you said: "No. Learning to love is. That can be read with a variety of inflections. All, I think, are equally valid", you appeared to be debating me about it on a thread created for doing that.
Learning to love is the mainstay of living a meaningful life.
You are welcomed to disagree, but I won't debate you about it.