One of the elite chess players is a Christian

Originally posted by @secondson
It ill behooves you to find something positive to say about anything a Christian posts in this forum doesn't it?

Do they still use words like “behooves” in conversation where you live?

Originally posted by @fmf
That would have been better than what you decided to lead with. So I was wrong. You did have something better to offer than what you chose to lead with.

There's only one good reason why a person is an "elite" chess player regardless of race, religion or national origin, and that is he wins games.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Do they still use words like “behooves” in conversation where you live?

Do they still have conversations where you live?

Originally posted by @secondson
There's only one good reason why a person is an "elite" chess player regardless of race, religion or national origin, and that is he wins games.

This'd have made a good leading post from you. Better than the addressed-to-divegeester one.

Originally posted by @secondson
Do they still have conversations where you live?

Wow, I’m stumped at you razor sharp quips.

Originally posted by @fmf
This'd have made a good leading post from you. Better than the addressed-to-divegeester one.

In your opinion.

Still, your reply to my reply to divegeester's reply to the OP would have been better suited if it had been directed at divegeester.

Originally posted by @secondson
In your opinion.

Still, your reply to my reply to divegeester's reply to the OP would have been better suited if it had been directed at divegeester.

I concurred with divegeester's first post on page 1. I thought it was apt given the nature of the OP. In fact, I suspect that you agree.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Wow, I’m stumped at you razor sharp quips.

Are you bitter because my quips are sharper than your quips?

Originally posted by @fmf
I concurred with divegeester's first post on page 1. I thought it was apt given the nature of the OP. In fact, I suspect that you agree.

I thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP, but divegeester's reply was trite, mean spirited and without substance.

Originally posted by @secondson
I thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP, but divegeester's reply was trite, mean spirited and without substance.

I think it was funny. The OP is Christian froth at its most facile.

Originally posted by @secondson
I thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP, but divegeester's reply was trite, mean spirited and without substance.

Ok, can you explain, precisely please, why my first post was either trite, mean spirited or without substance?

Originally posted by @secondson
Are you bitter because my quips are sharper than your quips?

Have you stopped beating your children?

Originally posted by @fmf
I think it was funny. The OP is Christian froth at its most facile.

Of course you do. It's in your nature.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Ok, can you explain, precisely please, why my first post was either trite, mean spirited or without substance?

Trite because it lacked originality.

Mean spirited because of your implied sarcasm.

Without substance because it was void of relevance to the OP.

Originally posted by @divegeester
Have you stopped beating your children?

Yes. Now they beat me.