22 Jul '18 13:52>
Originally posted by @secondsonI thought sonship's reply was a bit of saccharine fluff most likely insincere. The OP deserves gentle ribbing.
I thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP,
Originally posted by @secondsonI thought sonship's reply was a bit of saccharine fluff most likely insincere. The OP deserves gentle ribbing.
I thought sonship' reply was "apt" and relevant to the OP,
Originally posted by @secondsonThank you 🙂
Trite because it lacked originality.
Mean spirited because of your implied sarcasm.
Without substance because it was void of relevance to the OP.
Originally posted by @fmfI won't argue with that, except I think sonship is devoutly sincere.
I thought sonship's reply was a bit of saccharine fluff most likely insincere. The OP deserves gentle ribbing.
Originally posted by @secondsonSaul was devoutly sincere when he went about persecuting, and murdering the disciples of Christ. Sincere and devout is not necessarily a virtue especially when that person knows the teachings of Christ and refuse to accept it. In fact the world is full of devout and sincere people many of whom you condemn.
I won't argue with that, except I think sonship is devoutly sincere.
Originally posted by @secondsonSonship is sincere when he says that the lost will be hung in chains of punishment as a warning to beings on other planets, he is also sincere when he says that the lost will glorify Jesus in their endless woe.
I won't argue with that, except I think sonship is devoutly sincere.
Originally posted by @divegeesterTake it up with sonship.
Sonship is sincere when he says that the lost will be hung in chains of punishment as a warning to beings on other planets, he is also sincere when he says that the lost will glorify Jesus in their endless woe.
What do you think of that kind of sincerity SecondSon?
Originally posted by @rajk999Whatever you say Nabal.
Saul was devoutly sincere when he went about persecuting, and murdering the disciples of Christ. Sincere and devout is not necessarily a virtue especially when that person knows the teachings of Christ and refuse to accept it. In fact the world is full of devout and sincere people many of whom you condemn.
Originally posted by @secondsonWhy would I do that, it was YOU who brought up sonship’s sincerity in his beliefs. I’m now asking YOU if you are still impressed with his “sincerity” when it applied to these strange beliefs he holds.
Take it up with sonship.
Originally posted by @divegeesterActually it was FMF that brought up sonship' sincerity, and then you echoed it.
Why would I do that, it was YOU who brought up sonship’s sincerity in his beliefs. I’m now asking YOU if you are still impressed with his “sincerity” when it applied to these strange beliefs he holds.
Clearly you are going run away, but that’s what most of the so-called Christians here do when caught in a pmciple pinch.
Originally posted by @secondsondivegeester's first post on this thread was fine. It was the gentle ribbing that the OP deserved. You've conceded as much.
Take it up with sonship.
In the mean time, if I were FMF, I'd ask you if you can contribute something substantive to the subject matter of the OP, but I'm not FMF, so I won't ask you if you have something substantive to contribute because I don't think you do.
Originally posted by @secondsonFor a professed Christian you lack balls, gumption and conviction to do and say the right things.
Whatever you say Nabal.
Originally posted by @secondsonStill avoiding my question, still nothing (of substance [sic]) to contribute.
Actually it was FMF that brought up sonship' sincerity, and then you echoed it.
Originally posted by @rajk999SecondSon is probably one of the weakest posters here, but he enjoys the fray nonetheless.
For a professed Christian you lack balls, gumption and conviction to do and say the right things.