19 Apr '11 03:40>
Originally posted by josephwsATAN? who is that?
[b]"What do you think JC would answer?"
"Get thou behind me Satan". 😉[/b]
Originally posted by karoly aczelA magical person with a red tail (with trident on the end) whos going to burn people like me
sATAN? who is that?
Originally posted by AgergThere is no god as "He" is everywhere and everything with all possible permutations, (multiverses, dimensions,etc.), even all the stuff we haven't yet discovered yet, so there is not one part of all we know that can be called ("God" or "god" ) because as soon as you isolate an idea it becomes divided in the sense that it no longer contains everything and hence is not, CANNOT be god.
A magical person with a red tail (with trident on the end) whos going to burn people like me
forever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ev s decided you deserve for your terrible crime of non-belief
fundie God...what a dick! 😵
Originally posted by karoly aczelHe probably wouldn't "care".
Do you think that if Jesus was right there next to you that he would want his name to be capitalized when referred to in the second person? (ie. "He" did this and that, or "he" did this and that?)
What do you think JC would answer?
Could I get one word answers to kick this off? (Yes, no, maybe, etc.)
Originally posted by karoly aczelBiases.
So, ua41 ,(or anyone else), why do you think that most christians, (especially most that post here), cant understand the holistic nature of spirituality?
(We're all in the same boat)
Originally posted by ua41I've tried several different times to respond to this, but I just couldn't get a good enough of an answer happenning, so I'll just leave this as a "bump" so that I may re-rail my train of thought. Even if I don't, your response is worth it.
Biases.
Even my holistic approach, I'm still only responding on perception based on contexts. Perhaps it's a foundational aspect to approach spirituality (et. all) on a mutual basis- who knows, not my concern. I'm not convinced the division exists in the first place. Same regarding all the notions brought up about god being separate from man in your post. Polarities all weaved into each other- which thread on the ball of yarn do you want to tug on?
Originally posted by karoly aczelWell, He said:
Do you think that if Jesus was right there next to you that he would want his name to be capitalized when referred to in the second person? (ie. "He" did this and that, or "he" did this and that?)
What do you think JC would answer?
Could I get one word answers to kick this off? (Yes, no, maybe, etc.)
Originally posted by karoly aczelGiven that you mark Christian Satan as a special case of some other notions of "Satan" that in this instance doesn't exist I infer that you think some sort of Satan does exist...care to elaborate?
There is no god as "He" is everywhere and everything with all possible permutations, (multiverses, dimensions,etc.), even all the stuff we haven't yet discovered yet, so there is not one part of all we know that can be called ("God" or "god" ) because as soon as you isolate an idea it becomes divided in the sense that it no longer contains everything a ...[text shortened]... atan* is not real.
So neither of them exist.
(*- the Christian version of satan)
Originally posted by AgergNot really.
Given that you mark Christian Satan as a special case of some other notions of "Satan" that in this instance doesn't exist I infer that you think some sort of Satan does exist...care to elaborate?