@fmf saidIf you can't "discern" that I was referring to the character of yours and divegeester's posts rather than their specific content, then I don't know what to tell you.
I can't recall saying anything about the religious belief side of this topic - sticking instead to the geopolitical side - whereas I can't recall divegeester deviating much from the religious belief aspect.
If you cannot discern that difference between our contributions and you think they have been "virtually the same", it makes you seem odd. Perhaps you haven't been reading ...[text shortened]... ange that you cannot recognize these contrasting stances and claim to find them "indistinguishable".
But like divegeester I'm sure you'll have an argument against that too.
@whodey saidYes, Rajk knows all about the sins of Christians posting in this forum, and he doesn't even know who we are.
All you have to do is talk to Raj then.
I have a thought; the real difference between Rajk and we Christians is that we are disillusioned while Rajk is still subject to his illusions.
-Removed-@philokalia said
"Roman Catholicism is not God's will, it's not the absolute correct church of God."
You replied:
"Why not? How do you know? What is the “absolute correct church of god”?"
To which I replied:
"If you have to ask..."
Then just above you say you wonder about my "ability to comprehend certain words and word strings?"
Two pages go by and you lose the thread of thought.
When I said "if you have to ask..." I was inferring that you don't appear to know or recognize what or who is the church of God.
Maybe you do, maybe you don't, but you seem reluctant to contribute any knowledge of the same to the discourse, just as I have pointed out to you with regards to your making of any relevant positive contribution to the topic of the discussion about end time events.
And you are most certainly evasive since you won't even reply to the specific question posed to you in my post(eleventh from the top), except to say "It's not evasive, how is my reply evasive."
Oh the irony of apologizing for implying that I'm "a bit thick".
You are thick. Now go learn how to focus on how to have a debate discussion with other thinking adults. 🤔 ❓
-Removed-Your presumptuous biases are blinding you to the fact that the Bible has specific things to say about the course of history and human events. You appear to have little or no biblical knowledge with regards to prophecy. All of your replies to all of the posts made in this thread discussing the prophetic and its real world applications are nothing but belligerent and scornful diatribes against Christians.
You need help.
Here's your last chance to redeem yourself. Answer the question you have evaded miserably.
Do you not agree that there's an end game and that all events relative to human experience are leading to a conclusion?
-Removed-What is clear is that you are evasive.
And, as evidenced by your refusal to make positive relevant contributions to the topic of discussion except to deride those willing to offer their thoughts relative to the prophetic, it appears you are ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ except for making the occasional and elusive and trite lip service comment that you're a Christian.
Otherwise everything else you say and contribute is, for all intents and purposes, disdain for your brothers in Christ.
@secondson saidFeel free to sidestep the content, then.
If you can't "discern" that I was referring to the character of yours and divegeester's posts rather than their specific content, then I don't know what to tell you.
@secondson saidRajk999's schtick is the theology of "sin", of not "sinning", and of the obligation to obey Christ's commandments. I can't remember him ever asking anyone about their personal lives, let alone "knowing all about the sins of Christians on this forum". It's long been intriguing to me how many Christians here misrepresent what Rajk999 believes and then criticize that misrepresented version instead.
Yes, Rajk knows all about the sins of Christians posting in this forum, and he doesn't even know who we
@secondson saidAre you against "scornful diatribes"?
You appear to have little or no biblical knowledge with regards to prophecy. All of your replies to all of the posts made in this thread discussing the prophetic and its real world applications are nothing but belligerent and scornful diatribes against Christians.
You need help.
@secondson saidI have confronted the non-superstitious content of medullah's theories head on with observations and questions.
Look who's talking.
@fmf saidSurely you are joking!
Rajk999's schtick is the theology of "sin", of not "sinning", and of the obligation to obey Christ's commandments. I can't remember him ever asking anyone about their personal lives, let alone "knowing all about the sins of Christians on this forum". It's long been intriguing to me how many Christians here misrepresent what Rajk999 believes and then criticize that misrepresented version instead.
You are obviously duped by Rajk's "schtick".
Rajk has consistently and continuously labeled Christians everywhere as "goats" headed for hell. He is a self righteous pharisaical hypocrite that promotes a false gospel contrary to the gospel of Jesus Christ. Whether you know it or not.
Rajk's "schtick" includes a number of erroneous ideas related to Bible doctrine the least of which is his insistence on the idea that salvation is earned.
Rajk's "schtick" is to evade that argument by making accusations against his detractors without addressing the points made that clearly demonstrate his error.
Rajk palms himself off on these boards as a self styled follower of Jesus with apostolic authority, but fails to have a single other poster backing his shallow and unbiblical pronouncements.
And Rajk gets a pass by posters like you that ignore the fact that while he spouts off about "keeping Jesus' commandments" he himself violates the prime directive and spews his hate.
Rajk's "version" of the gospel of God's grace is directly contradicted by scripture, which in fact pronounces an anathema on anyone that promotes another gospel other than the one scripture teaches, which is exactly what Rajk does.
Whether you know it or not.