"Only God's judgment is infallible..."

Originally posted by @fmf
No. Not upset in the slightest. You asked me who I thought you seem to have a grudge or grievance against. So I told you.

Well at least you have a vivid imagination I’ll give you that much. 😵

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Well at least you have a vivid imagination I’ll give you that much. 😵

I am going on [1] what you've told us about your upbringing, and [2] how you behave. I have simply been reading stuff not imagining stuff.

Originally posted by @fmf
I am going on [1] what you've told us about your upbringing, and [2] how you behave. I have simply been reading stuff not imagining stuff.

I haven’t claimed any of the things you are imagining. You may imagine certain things such as me having grudges etc. but that is purely your imagination. Or maybe you think you are a mind reader.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I haven’t claimed any of the things you are imagining. You may imagine certain things such as me having grudges etc. but that is purely your imagination. Or maybe you think you are a mind reader.

I'm not a mind reader. I'm a posts reader. 😉

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I haven’t claimed any of the things you are imagining. You may imagine certain things such as me having grudges etc. but that is purely your imagination. Or maybe you think you are a mind reader.

He collects strawman arguments the way some children collect little dolls. They're all lined up neatly side by side just like on a child's shelf.

Strawman1, strawman2, strawman3 ... strawmanN

Originally posted by @sonship about FMF
He collects strawman arguments the way some children collect little dolls. They're all lined up neatly side by side just like on a child's shelf.

Strawman1, strawman2, strawman3 ... strawmanN

Do you really think so? I think you're are being disingenuous.

Originally posted by @fmf
Do you really think so? I think you're are being disingenuous.

Yes, I really think so.

And of course it appears to you as "disingenuous". What contradicting you would NOT appear to you as "disingenuous" ?

Originally posted by @sonship
Yes, I really think so.

And of course it appears to you as "disingenuous". What contradicting you would NOT appear to you as "disingenuous" ?

I think most of my observations and question are not only pertinent but actually zero in on a key issue of weakness or incoherence that has the makings of a discussion between a believer and a non-believer. In some level you know this.

Disingenuous is a polite way of saying that you are not being honest and that you are simply uncomfortable talking to non-believers who engage you persistently in debate and discussion. You are pointedly not here for "debate and discussion"..

Originally posted by @fmf
I'm not a mind reader. I'm a posts reader. 😉

You are either a liar or a mind reader because I have never claimed to have a grudge against anyone. It’s quite obvious which you are.

Originally posted by @sonship
He collects strawman arguments the way some children collect little dolls. They're all lined up neatly side by side just like on a child's shelf.

Strawman1, strawman2, strawman3 ... strawmanN

He has quite a collection. 😵

Originally posted by @dj2becker
You are either a liar or a mind reader because I have never claimed to have a grudge against anyone. It’s quite obvious which you are.

How on earth can I be "lying" when I say I believe you have a massive chip on your shoulder for the reasons I have given? Lying? Huh?

You mean you think I actually don’t believe what I say I believe, and that I am lying when I say that I do?

Originally posted by @fmf
I think most of my observations and question are not only pertinent but actually zero in on a key issue of weakness or incoherence that has the makings of a discussion between a believer and a non-believer. In some level you know this.

Disingenuous is a polite way of saying that you are not being honest and that you are simply uncomfortable talking to non-b ...[text shortened]... persistently in debate and discussion. You are pointedly not here for "debate and discussion"..

Again, you attempt to define legitimate discourse and participation in this forum as one feeling "comfortable" with perpetual, repetitious, monotonous, time wasting, compulsory, never ending, quarreling with you.

All such who may see the futility of much further exchanges with you are not legitimate users of the facility.

Ask me your most supposedly UNCOMFORTABLE question you can concoct. Let's see if I have a heart attack.

Give me your best shot today.

Originally posted by @divegeester
When you answer my question unequivocally and without a bunch of caveats and surround sound text we can move forward.

Bump for sonship, the destroyer of strawmen.

Originally posted by @sonship
Again, you attempt to define legitimate discourse and participation in this forum as one feeling "comfortable" with perpetual, repetitious, monotonous, time wasting, compulsory, never ending, quarreling with you.

Feel free to ignore my posts, sonship.

Originally posted by @fmf
Feel free to ignore my posts, sonship.

Originally posted by @sonship
Again, you attempt to define legitimate discourse and participation in this forum as one feeling "comfortable" with perpetual, repetitious, monotonous, time wasting, compulsory, never ending, quarreling with you.

Like Grampy Bobby, sonship seems to feel that disagreement with his ideology and especially dissent of his presumed religious authority are in fact this quoted list of negative behaviors. Before long he'll be accusing his detractors of fouling the forum with their "soiled diapers" (credited to Grampy Bobby) or regurgitating his own classic "diseased minds" accusation.