22 Dec 22
@chaney3 saidWhy don’t you have crack at explaining it first then?
Explain origin of life.
Genesis claims that God created a man, an adult man, who could survive.
Non believers skip over this subject, and sound foolish doing so.
Please don't just bypass origin of life, and skip straight to Darwin.
22 Dec 22
@divegeester saidThat's easy.
Why don’t you have crack at explaining it first then?
The creation story of Adam seems plausible.
The first barrier to consider is if one believes in a Creator.
22 Dec 22
@chaney3 saidThe chicken or the egg question is actually important.
That's easy.
The creation story of Adam seems plausible.
The first barrier to consider is if one believes in a Creator.
Only a full grown chicken has the chance to survive, the egg is doomed.
That's why, origin of life must begin with an adult.
22 Dec 22
@divegeester saidGive it time.
Short thread.
The "brains" of atheism have not contributed yet.
@chaney3 saidDo you believe that your personal subjective assertion that "the creation story of Adam seems plausible" creates any onus, philosophically speaking, on other people to agree with you or to propose some alternative that seems even more "plausible" to you?
The creation story of Adam seems plausible.
@chaney3 saidThis was explained to you in another thread.
Funny.
No moonbus, no bigdogg.
Evolution does not explain how life got started and does not propose to explain how life got started. Evolution explains speciation.
A plausible explanation how life got started is the subject of bio-chemistry, not evolution.
Take it to Science.
