Originally posted by RJHinds Like I told Dasa, I fell for that argument once myself and started
making sure I posted every reference until I realized how ridiculous
it was to cowtail to the likes of you. You or your kind have no
authority over me so I can do as I please and so can Dasa. Sorry
Dasa, I am not going to cowtail to you either and stop eating meat.
Since when has acknowledging another persons words or ideas been "cowtailing"? (whatever that means).
It is plagiarism to present another persons work as your own. If you make a post in a forum (especially a debate forum) where you use insights, ideas or quotations from another person without crediting them, you are stealing their intellectual literary work.
Not to mention discrediting your argument and making yourself look small-minded.
Originally posted by Dasa But everyone knows it is the truth of the Veda.
Truth cannot be plagiarised it belongs to everyone and it is eternal and belongs to no single person.
The postings are Vedic sourced.
And they know this because I am constantly telling them that this knowledge is from the Veda.
It usually has S.B, or B.G. or something and if it doesn't they still know ...[text shortened]... d of the day the person doesn't care less about the subject that is supposedly plagiarised.
Hang on a minute.......
You posted some text from a creationist Christian website in the science forum a couple of weeks ago, when i asked you to put in a link showing the origin of the text you said....................OK.
You acknowledged your cut and paste and the fact you shoud site the original source. What's changed?!
Originally posted by Proper Knob Hang on a minute.......
You posted some text from a creationist Christian website in the science forum a couple of weeks ago, when i asked you to put in a link showing the origin of the text you said....................OK.
You acknowledged your cut and paste and the fact you shoud site the original source. What's changed?!
Nothing ..............I will do as you ask.
We are just talking about the subject of plagiarism and its become a little heated.
From now on to appease everyone I shall put at the end of each cut and paste (From the Vedas)
That particular post that you mentioned was a link on a Vedic website and I didn't bother to notice what that link was at all.
Originally posted by FMF Posting text that someone else wrote without conceding the fact, or citing the source or the rightful author's name, or giving the URL/link, is "claiming words" as your own. You have been caught doing it time and time again.
Stop pretending you don't know the author.
The author is the Veda.
And you know the author is the Veda.
You are creating disturbance by your pretence of not knowing.
Originally posted by Dasa Stop pretending you don't know the author.
The author is the Veda.
So - for example - the book review of Forbidden Archaeology and the summary of its content - which a Google search indicated was plagiarism - was in fact from the Vedas?
Originally posted by Dasa From now on to appease everyone I shall put at the end of each cut and paste (From the Vedas)
I doubt that anyone is the slightest bit concerned about how you quote the Vedas. No one here, bar maybe 1 or 2 exceptions, submits to their "authority" anyway.
If you take material like book reviews or biographical information or polemical material from blogs, all written by other users of the net, do not try to pass it off as your own. You should show more self-respect.
Originally posted by RJHinds Like I told Dasa, I fell for that argument once myself and started
making sure I posted every reference until I realized how ridiculous
it was to cowtail to the likes of you. You or your kind have no
authority over me so I can do as I please and so can Dasa. Sorry
Dasa, I am not going to cowtail to you either and stop eating meat.
Originally posted by Dasa From now on to appease everyone I shall put at the end of each cut and paste (From the Vedas)
I wouldn't bother with those posts as I doubt anyone reads them anyway. Your last (in a long string of) accusation of plagiarism was your op about some scientific author; that you should reference.
Originally posted by Proper Knob Hang on a minute.......
You posted some text from a creationist Christian website in the science forum a couple of weeks ago, when i asked you to put in a link showing the origin of the text you said....................OK.
You acknowledged your cut and paste and the fact you shoud site the original source. What's changed?!
You need to study religion because you don't know the difference between
Christianity and Hinduism.
Originally posted by avalanchethecat I think the word you're looking for is 'kowtow'.
I would not do that either. But "cowtailing" is a slang term and it is
like a dog putting his tail between his legs and running. The cow,
however, puts her tail up in the air and runs. Being from the city you
probably would not know that.
P.S. I would think Dasa would know due to his love of cows.
Originally posted by FMF I doubt that anyone is the slightest bit concerned about how you quote the Vedas. No one here, bar maybe 1 or 2 exceptions, submits to their "authority" anyway.
If you take material like book reviews or biographical information or polemical material from blogs, all written by other users of the net, do not try to pass it off as your own. You should show more self-respect.
If you are really concerned about this plagerizing, why not inform the
sources so they can take care of it?
Originally posted by RJHinds If you are really concerned about this plagerizing, why not inform the
sources so they can take care of it?
You are missing the point. Plagiarism is an affront to fellow community members, especially when carried out by those who like telling fellow community members that they are dishonest.
Plagiarism.
25 Aug '11 07:07
Back to Top