Originally posted by @dj2beckerI don't agree.
If none of our opinions have the possibility of being factual you are wasting your time here.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI don't think sharing my opinions is a waste of time.
If you think that none of our opinions can be factual it is a complete waste of time.
Originally posted by @fmfDepends on whether their personal feelings, tastes, or opinions take precedence over their religious text or not. If not, they will regard their text as an objective standard.
dj2becker, are the moral stances of all adherents to all religions [by which I mean those that stipulate moral codes] "objective"?
FMF: dj2becker, are the moral stances of all adherents to all religions [by which I mean those that stipulate moral codes] "objective"?I am asking YOU what YOU would regard as "objective". If adherents to any or all other religions [i.e. other than your own] assert that their personal feelings, tastes, or opinions do not take precedence over their religious text ~ as you do about the religious text you personally favour ~ would you regard whatever those religionists' morals and opinions as being "objective"?
Originally posted by @dj2becker
Depends on whether their personal feelings, tastes, or opinions take precedence over their religious text or not. If not, they will regard their text as an objective standard.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhere did I say this? Can you quote the post? Was it on this thread? Second time of asking.
If you don't believe that any opinion can be factual ...