Originally posted by sjeg Not exactly: creation and evolution do not exclude on another at all logically. I hope you do actually see that, and that is has nothing to do with 'creationism'. But that topic has been done to death here, so I won't bore you all any further.
Most recently in the Why did God create DNA thread, in which the lack of fundamentalist response is conspicuous for its absence.
Originally posted by dj2becker COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) If I say something does not have a cause, it has no cause.
(2) I say the universe has no cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has no cause.
(4) Therefore, God does not exist.
COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) If I say something does not have a cause, it has no cause.
(2) I say that neither you nor this thread have a cause.
(3) Therefore, neither you nor this thread has any cause.
(4) Therefore, neither you nor this thread actually exist.
[b]
Sweet!
Originally posted by zombies COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) If I say something does not have a cause, it has no cause.
[b]-on what authority does what you (a mere mortal) say become reality (2) I say the universe has no cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has no cause.
(4) Therefore, God does not exist.
ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) I cannot conceive a perfect God.
-God conceive ...[text shortened]... oose differently death shall be your reward, and you go straight to the pit of hell. hahaaa[/b]
You've certainly refuted any possible claim that you have a sense of humor. Well done! 🙄
umm, actually, every single one of these arguments have a logical fallacy and/or or assume something they shouldn't and can't in order to make their point.
Originally posted by dj2becker COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) If I say something does not have a cause, it has no cause.
(2) I say the universe has no cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has no cause.
(4) Therefore, God does not exist.
ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) I cannot conceive a perfect God.
(2) One of the qualities of perfection is existence.
(3) Therefore, God does not exist.
...[text shortened]... God! I do not I do not I do not I DO NOT believe in God!
(2) Therefore, God does not exist.
Ha ha, this is too funny!
How about another one?
(1) dj2becker exists.
(2) God wouldn't allow someone with such a poor grasp of logic to become one of His spokespeople.
(3) Therefore, god doesn't exist.
umm, actually, every single one of these arguments have a logical fallacy and/or or assume something they shouldn't and can't in order to make their point.
All those arguments are a joke. Don't worry: the last thing that I would believe is that God does not exist.😏
Edit: This is just to explain to all those that have have sent PMs to try to convince me that God exists!😞
10 Oct '05 09:34
Proof of God's Non-existance
Back to Top