1. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    03 Jan '13
    Moves
    13080
    14 Jan '15 17:54
    Originally posted by vivify
    I'm not all-powerful, omnipresent and omniscient, as the bible claims God is. If was, and still allowed my child to eat something that would result in terrible suffering all the rest of his days, who's at fault?
    I'm not all-powerful, omnipresent and omniscient, as the bible claims God is. If was, and still allowed my child to eat something that would result in terrible suffering all the rest of his days, who's at fault?


    Would you say then that NOTHING is a man's fault?
    That would have catastrophic consequences for civilization as an overall philosophy.

    All is to be blamed on an "all-powerful, omnipresent and omniscient" God. Doesn't that give me great leeway to rip you off in any manner I choose and not feel responsible ?
  2. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    14 Jan '15 19:22
    Originally posted by sonship
    I'm not all-powerful, omnipresent and omniscient, as the bible claims God is. If was, and still allowed my child to eat something that would result in terrible suffering all the rest of his days, who's at fault?


    Would you say then that NOTHING is a man's fault?
    That would have catastrophic consequences for civilization as an overall p ...[text shortened]... esn't that give me great leeway to rip you off in any manner I choose and not feel responsible ?
    I'm talking about one singular event: the Garden of Eden.

    Why are all of you dodging such a simple question? Let me ask one last time:

    I'm not all-powerful, omnipresent and omniscient, as the bible claims God is. If was, and still allowed my child to eat something that would result in terrible suffering all the rest of his days, who's at fault?
  3. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    03 Jan '13
    Moves
    13080
    14 Jan '15 20:261 edit
    Originally posted by vivify
    I'm not all-powerful, omnipresent and omniscient, as the bible claims God is. If was, and still allowed my child to eat something that would result in terrible suffering all the rest of his days, who's at fault?


    Some people would argue that the entire fall of man into sin is God's fault.
    I do not see it that way.

    Does that answer your question?

    Let's say I am wrong. Let's say that we can squarely place all the blame for the fall of man on the Creator God. After the questionable smugness of self congradulations that we have placed all fault on God, this glee for me would wear out.

    And THEN I would give attention to the foreknowledge God had to already have a plan of salvation in mind that I could be rescued from the infestation of sin and death.

    I think after any initial self congratulations for siting God as guilty somehow, I would change my priorities to examine why Christ died and rose that I might be saved, justified, reconciled to God and brought back to His eternal purpose before chapter three's events took place.

    IE. The dubious joy of scapegoating would not occupy me forever. I must turn to God's salvation plan, regardless.
  4. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    100919
    15 Jan '15 00:14
    Originally posted by sonship
    I'm not all-powerful, omnipresent and omniscient, as the bible claims God is. If was, and still allowed my child to eat something that would result in terrible suffering all the rest of his days, who's at fault?


    Some people would argue that the entire fall of man into sin is God's fault.
    I do not see it that way.

    Does that answer ...[text shortened]... oy of scapegoating would not occupy me forever. I must turn to God's salvation plan, regardless.
    I agree, I don't believe God is at fault, but even if he was, so what? He is still God and I am a nobody.
    BTW
    I have heard some teaching and many believe, that god is not omniscient, but that he is so far ahead in his thinking that it wouldn't matter. I am not saying I agree, but it does have some merit.
  5. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    15 Jan '15 01:26
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    I agree, I don't believe God is at fault, but even if he was, so what? He is still God and I am a nobody.
    BTW
    I have heard some teaching and many believe, that god is not omniscient, but that he is so far ahead in his thinking that it wouldn't matter. I am not saying I agree, but it does have some merit.
    Would a non-omniscient God know that He doesn't know everything there is to know?🙂

    Could an omnipotent God set up a universe in which things happened without His foreknowledge? I do it all the time.🙂
  6. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    15 Jan '15 02:171 edit
    Originally posted by JS357
    Would a non-omniscient God know that He doesn't know everything there is to know?🙂

    Could an omnipotent God set up a universe in which things happened without His foreknowledge? I do it all the time.🙂
    If omniscience means something like 'knows all true propositions' and omnipotent means something like 'can do anything that is logically possible', then a god that possesses both qualities can't set up a universe with events that happen without his foreknowledge, nor can he know that he does not know everything there is to know [because that proposition is false].
  7. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    100919
    15 Jan '15 05:13
    Originally posted by JS357
    Would a non-omniscient God know that He doesn't know everything there is to know?🙂

    Could an omnipotent God set up a universe in which things happened without His foreknowledge? I do it all the time.🙂
    http://www.truthortradition.com/articles/does-god-know-every-future-event-in-human-history
  8. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    100919
    15 Jan '15 05:13
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    If omniscience means something like 'knows all true propositions' and omnipotent means something like 'can do anything that is logically possible', then a god that possesses both qualities can't set up a universe with events that happen without his foreknowledge, nor can he know that he does not know everything there is to know [because that proposition is false].
    See above
  9. Joined
    29 Dec '08
    Moves
    6788
    15 Jan '15 05:181 edit
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    http://www.truthortradition.com/articles/does-god-know-every-future-event-in-human-history
    I was only picking up on "I have heard some teaching and many believe, that god is not omniscient, but that he is so far ahead in his thinking that it wouldn't matter. I am not saying I agree, but it does have some merit."

    What merit has it?
  10. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    15 Jan '15 06:34
    Originally posted by checkbaiter
    See above
    OK, so they don't believe god is omniscient, at least, not in accordance with the definition that I gave.

    Seems reasonable to me, actually, that some Christians would NOT believe God is omniscient. It would spare them much grief in combating things like the Argument From Evil, and explain many of the passages in the Bible in which God appears not to know certain things.
  11. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    15 Jan '15 09:33
    Originally posted by vivify
    I'm not all-powerful, omnipresent and omniscient, as the bible claims God is. If was, and still allowed my child to eat something that would result in terrible suffering all the rest of his days, who's at fault?
    I don't recall the Holy Bible using the words "omnipresent and omniscient" to describe God. God can certainly be in more than one place at the same time if God is a trinity of three persons, but I don't recall the Holy Bible saying God can be every place at the same time. Certainly God must be capable of learning, don't you think?
  12. Subscriberjosephw
    Owner
    Scoffer Mocker
    Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9958
    15 Jan '15 19:36
    Originally posted by vivify
    If I, as a parent, knowingly let my child eat something that will cause him needless and harsh suffering, who's at fault?
    You are!

    But Adam was a grown man and KNEW what he was doing. Just as the rest of us do.

    No excuses! You're projecting a human perspective on a scenario created by a being that can make no mistakes. The mistake was made by the man. The man has no excuses to make. The man has no defense against his maker that will stand up to reason. Leveling a charge of irresponsibility against a being incapable of error further exacerbates the man's predicament.
  13. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    15 Jan '15 19:574 edits
    Originally posted by josephw
    You are!

    But Adam was a grown man and KNEW what he was doing. Just as the rest of us do.
    Clearly, he didn't. The bible says they (Adam and Eve) didn't have wisdom. So much was their lack of wisdom and knowledge, they didn't even realize they were naked. It wasn't until after they ate the fruit that they knew this.

    Adam and Eve were as close to children as you can get. They had little knowledge of anything, they never had to learn anything, had nothing equivalent to "street smarts", and never even knew what pain and suffering were. You can't use the "grown man" argument for a man who never actually grew up.

    God is fully at fault.
  14. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    15 Jan '15 20:16
    Originally posted by josephw
    You are!

    But Adam was a grown man and KNEW what he was doing. Just as the rest of us do.

    No excuses! You're projecting a human perspective on a scenario created by a being that can make no mistakes. The mistake was made by the man. The man has no excuses to make. The man has no defense against his maker that will stand up to reason. Leveling a charge ...[text shortened]... f irresponsibility against a being incapable of error further exacerbates the man's predicament.
    Adam had no knowledge of good or evil - no moral compass. To blame him for an action that he took in that state seems foolish.
  15. R
    Standard memberRemoved
    Joined
    03 Jan '13
    Moves
    13080
    16 Jan '15 00:302 edits
    Originally posted by josephw
    But Adam was a grown man and KNEW what he was doing. Just as the rest of us do.


    He was not only a grown man. Adam was a pristinely intelligent man probably the likes of which has never existed since.

    Directly from the creative hand of God, Adam was exceptional.
    He just chose wrong, against God's warning.

    But where Adam failed, the Son of God did not fail no matter what it cost Him.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree