Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No it has everything to do with science, it simply interprets scientific data differently. For example, one observes the physical world and draws certain inferences (not proofs) about the nature of God. If i just keep nodding and smiling, will that be enough for you?
So now, suddenly, you change your mind?
You bring in your god as the creator of the scientific creationism idea of yours? Then you have to scientifically prove that there certainly is such a god.
So go ahead - Prove that there is a creationism god! Or, propose an experiment that really can be used prove an existance of a creator god.
When you fail with this, then come back and tell us that you earlier was wrong.
Because, you see, god isn't part of the nature, he is a supernatural being. Therefore not science. If you try to prove creationism, then you are dealing with pseudo-science.
And by this I have proved that you don't know the difference between science and pseudo-science.
Can you discuss this without going even further off-topic? And if you do: Tell us that you are allowed to go off-topic, and not others?