28 Nov '15 08:56>
Originally posted by sonshipIs this known as a fact and is it accepted by all Christians and biblical scholars?
The author, I believe is [b]John, the same author of the Gospel. [/b]
"And one of the angels who had the seven bowls came and spoke with me, saying, Come here, I will show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits upon many waters,
with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and those who dwell on earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication." (v,1)
"And on her forehead there was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF THE HARLOTS AND THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH." (v.5)
Originally posted by RJHindsYour comment is useful in that various judgments are revealed in Revelation. There is a judgment on world empires and there is judgment on religious empires.
And one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and spoke with me, saying, Come here; I will show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters. (1)
"And he carried me away in spirit into a wilderness; and I saw a woman sitting upon a scarlot beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads nad ten horns." (v.3)
"For the Lamb who is in the midst of the throne will shepherd them and guide them to springs of waters of life; and God shall wipe away every tear from their eyes." (Rev. 7:17)
" And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus." (6a)
Originally posted by FMFI didn't say it was true for you. You've rejected it.
To claim "everyone" knows it's true is patently untrue. On what basis do you claim it is "true" for everyone? In fact, scale it down: on what basis do you claim it is "true" for just you and me?
Originally posted by sonshipThis quotation is ambiguous. From the snippet it is not clear if the harlot is being judged or doing the judging. I feel this is fairly important to the interpretation of the quote.
(I made a mistake somewhere in a previous post, saying, I think, there were no capital letters in NT Greek. That was wrong. And I have started to re-study the language.)
The vision of Revelation 17 concerns a prostitute riding on a scarlet beast. It has to be symbolic. And the vision is about the judgment of such a prostitute. That judgment is a destru ...[text shortened]... of other woman like her. In other words, whatever she is has been duplicated in others like her.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou said "Everyone knows it's true, except those who have rejected it."
I didn't say it was true for you. You've rejected it.
Can we get on with the thread now?
Originally posted by DeepThoughtIt's rather clear that she is guilty, and so she is being judged. There would not be much meaning in her doing the judging.
This quotation is ambiguous. From the snippet it is not clear if the harlot is being judged or doing the judging. I feel this is fairly important to the interpretation of the quote.
We talk about the judgements of Solomon, where he is the judge. But this seems unlikely when talking about a "great harlot".
Originally posted by FMFYeah, yeah, yeah... I already said that this thread would be interesting if we could keep the naysayers and the interruptions to a minimum. I realize you want to make everything about yourself, but give it a rest.
You said "Everyone knows it's true, except those who have rejected it."
Isn't another way of saying this: "Everyone 'knows' it's true, except those who 'know' it isn't true."
It always strikes me as odd that your God figure (the way you and other Christians here tell it, anyway) has given such a tenuous and ill-defined 'revelation' to be getting on with. D ...[text shortened]... all humans with demonstrative and unequivocal indications of His existence and His instructions?
"And he carried me away in spirit into a wilderness; and I saw ... " (v.3)
Originally posted by SuzianneI am trying to make it about the credibility of the source ~ Book of Revelation ~ and the 'truth claim' Christians like you make about its origin and supposed 'divine inspiration'. It is you who wants to make it about me ~ and that is so often your go-to get-out when asked to justify the validity of things you claim.
Yeah, yeah, yeah... I already said that this thread would be interesting if we could keep the naysayers and the interruptions to a minimum. I realize you want to make everything about yourself, but give it a rest.
Originally posted by DeepThoughtThis quotation is ambiguous. From the snippet it is not clear if the harlot is being judged or doing the judging. I feel this is fairly important to the interpretation of the quote.
This quotation is ambiguous. From the snippet it is not clear if the harlot is being judged or doing the judging. I feel this is fairly important to the interpretation of the quote.
We talk about the judgements of Solomon, where he is the judge. But this seems unlikely when talking about a "great harlot".
Originally posted by DeepThoughtThis quotation is ambiguous. From the snippet it is not clear if the harlot is being judged or doing the judging. I feel this is fairly important to the interpretation of the quote.
" And the ten horns which you saw and the beast, THESE WILL HATE THE HARLOT ... "
"And the ten horns which you saw and the beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her desolate and naked and will eat her flesh and burn her utterly with fire. " (v.16)
"For God has put it into their hearts to perform His mind and to perform one mind and to give their kingdom to the beast until the words of God are accomplished.
And the woman whom you saw is the great city, which has a kingdom over the kings of the earth."
"Who OPPOSES and exalts himself above all that is called God or an object of worship, so that he sits in the temple of God, setting himself forth, saying that he is God." ( 2 Thess. 2:4)
"For God has put it into their hearts to perform His mind ..."